Back to Search Start Over

Diagnostic Accuracy of Lung Ultrasound Performed by Novice Versus Advanced Sonographers for Pneumonia in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis

Authors :
Jennifer N. Fishe
Julia K. Deanehan
Yu Hsun Wang
Jason T. Gillon
Daniel Ta Yo Yu
Chien-Chang Lee
Po-Yang Tsou
Pei-Lun Kuo
Kenneth P. Chen
Source :
Academic Emergency Medicine. 26:1074-1088
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
Wiley, 2019.

Abstract

BACKGROUND Childhood pneumonia is a leading cause of mortality worldwide. Growing evidence suggests that lung ultrasound (LUS) may be a reliable diagnostic alternative to chest x-ray for childhood pneumonia. However, it is unclear whether sonographer experience affects the diagnostic accuracy of LUS. We summarize the diagnostic accuracy of LUS for pneumonia and compare the performance between novice and advanced sonographers with a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS We searched PubMed and EMBASE from inception to February 2018 for eligible studies that evaluated the utility of LUS in children suspected of having pneumonia against the reference standard of either imaging results alone or a combination of clinical, laboratory, and imaging results. We reported the study using the Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies. We used QUADAS-2 to appraise the included studies' methodologic quality. We employed a random-effect bivariate model and a hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curve to evaluate LUS's performance characteristics. We conducted subgroup analyses and meta-regression based on level of sonographer training to summarize and compare LUS's diagnostic accuracy for pneumonia between novice (training ≤ 7 days) and advanced sonographers. RESULTS Twenty-five studies (n = 3,353) were included in the meta-analysis. For diagnosing pneumonia, LUS demonstrated an overall sensitivity of 0.94 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.89 to 0.97), specificity of 0.92 (95% CI = 0.78 to 0.98), positive likelihood ratio of 12.40 (95% CI = 4.00 to 38.10), and negative likelihood ratio of 0.07 (95% CI = 0.04 to 0.12), with an area under ROC curve of 0.97 (95% CI = 0.95 to 0.98). Meta-regression revealed a significant difference in the diagnostic accuracy for pneumonia for LUS between novice and advanced sonographers (p

Details

ISSN :
15532712 and 10696563
Volume :
26
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Academic Emergency Medicine
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....d29564954691df65bd73881d6c399718