Back to Search Start Over

Effect of pamidronate 30 mg versus 90 mg on physical function in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (Nordic Myeloma Study Group): a double-blind, randomised controlled trial

Authors :
Jan Westin
Christian Gluud
Anne K. Mylin
Peter Gimsing
Niels Frost Andersen
Gunnar Juliusson
Peter Fayers
Martin Hjorth
Ingerid Nesthus
Anders Waage
Lucia Ahlberg
Ingemar Turesson
Finn Wisløff
Lene Meldgaard Knudsen
Olle Linder
Annette Juul Vangsted
Kristina Carlson
Niels Abildgaard
Inger Marie S. Dahl
Johan Lanng Nielsen
Henrik Hjorth-Hansen
Henrik Gregersen
Source :
Gimsing, P, Carlson, K, Turesson, I, Fayers, P, Waage, A, Vangsted, A J, Mylin, A K, Gluud, C N, Juliusson, G, Gregersen, H, Hjorth-Hansen, H, Nesthus, I, Bahn, I M D, Westin, J, Nielsen, J L, Meldgaard Knudsen, L, Ahlberg, L, Hjorth, M, Abildgaard, N, Linder, O & Wisløff, F 2010, ' Effect of pamidronate 30 mg versus 90 mg on physical function in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (Nordic Myeloma Study Group): a double-blind, randomised controlled trial ', Lancet Oncology, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 973-82 . https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70198-4, Gimsing, P, Carlson, K, Turesson, I, Fayers, P, Waage, A, Vangsted, A, Mylin, A, Gluud, C, Juliusson, G, Gregersen, H, Hjorth-Hansen, H, Nesthus, I, Dahl, I M S, Westin, J, Nielsen, J L, Knudsen, L M, Ahlberg, L, Hjorth, M, Abildgaard, N, Andersen, N F, Linder, O & Wisløff, F 2010, ' Effect of pamidronate 30 mg versus 90 mg on physical function in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (Nordic Myeloma Study Group): a double-blind, randomised controlled trial ', Lancet Oncology, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 973-82 . https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70198-4, The Lancet Oncology; 11(10), pp 973-982 (2010)
Publication Year :
2010

Abstract

Udgivelsesdato: 2010-Oct BACKGROUND: Compared with placebo, prophylactic treatment with bisphosphonates reduces risk of skeletal events in patients with multiple myeloma. However, because of toxicity associated with long-term bisphosphonate treatment, establishing the lowest effective dose is important. This study compared the effect of two doses of pamidronate on health-related quality of life and skeletal morbidity in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. METHODS: This double-blind, randomised, phase 3 trial was undertaken at 37 clinics in Denmark, Norway, and Sweden. Patients with multiple myeloma who were starting antimyeloma treatment were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive one of two doses of pamidronate (30 mg or 90 mg) given by intravenous infusion once a month for at least 3 years. Randomisation was done by use of a central, computerised minimisation system. Primary outcome was physical function after 12 months estimated by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 questionnaire (scale 0-100). All patients who returned questionnaires at 12 months and were still on study treatment were included in the analysis of the primary endpoint. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00376883. FINDINGS: From January, 2001, until August, 2005, 504 patients were randomly assigned to pamidronate 30 mg or 90 mg (252 in each group). 157 patients in the 90 mg group and 156 in the 30 mg group were included in the primary analysis. Mean physical function at 12 months was 66 points (95% CI 62·9-70·0) in the 90 mg group and 68 points (64·6-71·4) in the 30 mg group (95% CI of difference -6·6 to 3·3; p=0·52). Median time to first skeletal-related event in patients who had such an event was 9·2 months (8·1-10·7) in the 90 mg group and 10·2 months (7·3-14·0) in the 30 mg group (p=0·63). In a retrospective analysis, eight patients in the pamidronate 90 mg group developed osteonecrosis of the jaw compared with two patients in the 30 mg group. INTERPRETATION: Monthly infusion of pamidronate 30 mg should be the recommended dose for prevention of bone disease in patients with multiple myeloma. FUNDING: Nordic Cancer Union and Novartis Healthcare.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
14745488
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Gimsing, P, Carlson, K, Turesson, I, Fayers, P, Waage, A, Vangsted, A J, Mylin, A K, Gluud, C N, Juliusson, G, Gregersen, H, Hjorth-Hansen, H, Nesthus, I, Bahn, I M D, Westin, J, Nielsen, J L, Meldgaard Knudsen, L, Ahlberg, L, Hjorth, M, Abildgaard, N, Linder, O & Wisløff, F 2010, ' Effect of pamidronate 30 mg versus 90 mg on physical function in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (Nordic Myeloma Study Group): a double-blind, randomised controlled trial ', Lancet Oncology, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 973-82 . https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70198-4, Gimsing, P, Carlson, K, Turesson, I, Fayers, P, Waage, A, Vangsted, A, Mylin, A, Gluud, C, Juliusson, G, Gregersen, H, Hjorth-Hansen, H, Nesthus, I, Dahl, I M S, Westin, J, Nielsen, J L, Knudsen, L M, Ahlberg, L, Hjorth, M, Abildgaard, N, Andersen, N F, Linder, O & Wisløff, F 2010, ' Effect of pamidronate 30 mg versus 90 mg on physical function in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (Nordic Myeloma Study Group): a double-blind, randomised controlled trial ', Lancet Oncology, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 973-82 . https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70198-4, The Lancet Oncology; 11(10), pp 973-982 (2010)
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....d14337e2f0265b893bdc7438dea6b674