Back to Search Start Over

Prospective use of ablation index for the ablation of right ventricle outflow tract premature ventricular contractions: a proof of concept study

Authors :
Giulio Zucchelli
Andrea Natale
Pasquale Notarstefano
Ardan M. Saguner
Alessio Gasperetti
Corrado Carbucicchio
Maria Grazia Bongiorni
Antonio Dello Russo
Firat Duru
Luigi Di Biase
Michela Casella
Domenico G. Della Rocca
Ezio Soldati
Rita Sicuso
Sanghamitra Mohanty
Claudio Tondo
University of Zurich
Source :
Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology. 23(1)
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Aims Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) represents an effective option for idiopathic premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) treatment. Ablation Index (AI) is a novel ablation marker incorporating RF power, contact force, and time of delivery into a single weighted formula. Data regarding AI-guided PVCs RFCA are currently lacking. Aim of the study was to compare AI-guided and standard RFCA outcomes in patients with PVCs originating from the right ventricle outflow tract (RVOT). Methods and results Consecutive patients undergoing AI-guided RFCA of RVOT idiopathic PVCs were prospectively enrolled. Radiofrequency catheter ablation was performed following per-protocol target cut-offs of AI, depending on targeted area (RVOT free wall AI cut-off: 590; RVOT septum AI cut-off: 610). A multi-centre cohort of propensity-matched (age, sex, ejection fraction, and PVC site) patients undergoing standard PVCs RFCA was used as a comparator. Sixty AI-guided patients (44.2 ± 18.0 years old, 58% male, left ventricular ejection fraction 56.2 ± 3.8%) were enrolled; 34 (57%) were ablated in RVOT septum and 26 (43%) patients in the RVOT free wall area. Propensity match with 60 non-AI-guided patients was performed. Acute outcomes and complications resulted comparable. At 6 months, arrhythmic recurrence was more common in non-AI-guided patients whether in general (28% vs. 7% P = 0.003) or by ablated area (RVOT free wall: 27% vs. 4%, P = 0.06; RVOT septum 29% vs. 9% P = 0.05). Ablation Index guidance was associated with improved survival from arrhythmic recurrence [overall odds ratio 6.61 (1.95–22.35), P = 0.001; RVOT septum 5.99 (1.21–29.65), P = 0.028; RVOT free wall 11.86 (1.12–124.78), P = 0.039]. Conclusion Ablation Index-guidance in idiopathic PVCs ablation was associated with better arrhythmic outcomes at 6 months of follow-up.

Details

ISSN :
15322092
Volume :
23
Issue :
1
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....d12d98cf78ff88d464c14d5315939083