Back to Search Start Over

Closed-Loop Doluisio (Colon, Small Intestine) and Single-Pass Intestinal Perfusion (Colon, Jejunum) in Rat—Biophysical Model and Predictions Based on Caco-2

Authors :
Alex Avdeef
Moran Zur
Teresa María Garrigues
Matilde Merino-Sanjuán
Isabel Lozoya-Agullo
Noa Fine-Shamir
Isabel González-Álvarez
Marival Bermejo
Yael Cohen
Milica Markovic
Marta González-Álvarez
Arik Dahan
Source :
Pharmaceutical Research. 35
Publication Year :
2017
Publisher :
Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2017.

Abstract

The effective rat intestinal permeability (P eff ) was deconvolved using a biophysical model based on parameterized paracellular, aqueous boundary layer, transcellular permeabilities, and the villus-fold surface area expansion factor. Four types of rat intestinal perfusion data were considered: single-pass intestinal perfusion (SPIP) in the jejunum (n = 40), and colon (n = 15), closed-loop (Doluisio type) in the small intestine (n = 78), and colon (n = 74). Moreover, in vitro Caco-2 permeability values were used to predict rat in vivo values in the rat data studied. Comparable number of molecules permeate via paracellular water channels as by the lipoidal transcellular route in the SPIP method, although in the closed-loop method, the paracellular route appears dominant in the colon. The aqueous boundary layer thickness in the small intestine is comparable to that found in unstirred in vitro monolayer assays; it is thinner in the colon. The mucosal surface area in anaesthetized rats is 0.96–1.4 times the smooth cylinder calculated value in the colon, and it is 3.1–3.6 times in the small intestine. The paracellular permeability of the intestine appeared to be greater in rat than human, with the colon showing more leakiness (higher P para ) than the small intestine. Based on log intrinsic permeability values, the correlations between the in vitro and in vivo models ranged from r2 0.82 to 0.92. The SPIP-Doluisio method comparison indicated identical log permeability selectivity trend with negligible bias.

Details

ISSN :
1573904X and 07248741
Volume :
35
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Pharmaceutical Research
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....cfb6e53aa5400f3eca3840d32d67fc82