Back to Search Start Over

A density assignment method for dose monitoring in head-and-neck radiotherapy

Authors :
O. Henry
Caroline Lafond
Joël Castelli
A. Barateau
N. Perichon
E Chajon
Antoine Simon
R. de Crevoisier
Ulrike Schick
Laboratoire Traitement du Signal et de l'Image (LTSI)
Université de Rennes (UR)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)
Hôpital de la Cavale Blanche - CHRU Brest (CHU - BREST )
Université de Rennes 1 (UR1)
Université de Rennes (UNIV-RENNES)-Université de Rennes (UNIV-RENNES)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)
Source :
Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, 2019, 195 (2), pp.175-185. ⟨10.1007/s00066-018-1379-y⟩, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, Springer Verlag (Germany), 2019, 195 (2), pp.175-185. ⟨10.1007/s00066-018-1379-y⟩
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

International audience; Background and purpose - During head-and-neck (H&N) radiotherapy, the parotid glands (PGs) may be overdosed; thus, a tool is required to monitor the delivered dose. This study aimed to assess the dose accuracy of a patient-specific density assignment method (DAM) for dose calculation to monitor the dose to PGs during treatment. Patients and methods - Forty patients with H&N cancer received an intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), among whom 15 had weekly CTs. Dose distributions were calculated either on the CTs (CT), on one-class CTs (1C-CT, water), or on three-class CTs (3C-CT, water-air-bone). The inter- and intra-patient DAM uncertainties were evaluated by the difference between doses calculated on CT and 1C-CTs or 3C-CTs. PG mean dose (D) and spinal cord maximum dose (D) were considered. The cumulated dose to the PGs was estimated by the mean D of the weekly CTs. Results - The mean (maximum) inter-patient DAM dose uncertainties for the PGs (in cGy) were 23 (75) using 1C-CTs and 12 (50) using 3C-CTs (p ≤ 0.001). For the spinal cord, these uncertainties were 118 (245) and 15 (67; p ≤ 0.001). The mean (maximum) DAM dose uncertainty between cumulated doses calculated on CTs and 3C-CTs was 7 cGy (45 cGy) for the PGs. Considering the difference between the planned and cumulated doses, 53% of the ipsilateral and 80% of the contralateral PGs were overdosed by +3.6 Gy (up to 8.2 Gy) and +1.9 Gy (up to 5.2 Gy), respectively. Conclusion - The uncertainty of the three-class DAM appears to be clinically non-significant (

Details

ISSN :
1439099X and 01797158
Volume :
195
Issue :
2
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....cf706cda612cbb4401d01de3187d35a6
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-018-1379-y⟩