Back to Search Start Over

Comparison of Techniques for Sampling Adult Necrophilous Insects From Pig Carcasses

Authors :
Coby Schal
Eduardo Hatano
Angela Cruise
D. W. Watson
Source :
Journal of Medical Entomology. 55:947-954
Publication Year :
2018
Publisher :
Oxford University Press (OUP), 2018.

Abstract

Studies of the pre-colonization interval and mechanisms driving necrophilous insect ecological succession depend on effective sampling of adult insects and knowledge of their diel and successional activity patterns. The number of insects trapped, their diversity, and diel periodicity were compared with four sampling methods on neonate pigs. Sampling method, time of day and decomposition age of the pigs significantly affected the number of insects sampled from pigs. We also found significant interactions of sampling method and decomposition day, time of sampling and decomposition day. No single method was superior to the other methods during all three decomposition days. Sampling times after noon yielded the largest samples during the first 2 d of decomposition. On day 3 of decomposition however, all sampling times were equally effective. Therefore, to maximize insect collections from neonate pigs, the method used to sample must vary by decomposition day. The suction trap collected the most species-rich samples, but sticky trap samples were the most diverse, when both species richness and evenness were factored into a Shannon diversity index. Repeated sampling during the noon to 18:00 hours period was most effective to obtain the maximum diversity of trapped insects. The integration of multiple sampling techniques would most effectively sample the necrophilous insect community. However, because all four tested methods were deficient at sampling beetle species, future work should focus on optimizing the most promising methods, alone or in combinations, and incorporate hand-collections of beetles.

Details

ISSN :
19382928 and 00222585
Volume :
55
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Medical Entomology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....ce9c13b7cecb42b84f6c15de94409dfd
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/jme/tjx255