Back to Search Start Over

Barthel Index score predicts mortality in elderly heart failure: a goal of comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation

Authors :
R Numazawa
Ryo Nishikawa
Masayuki Koyama
Akiyoshi Hashimoto
Nobutaka Nagano
Hidemichi Kouzu
Kanako Shimomura
Katsuhiko Ohori
Satoshi Katano
Tetsuji Miura
Takefumi Fujito
Masaki Katayose
Ryohei Nagaoka
Toshiyuki Yano
Suguru Honma
Source :
Web of Science
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Oxford University Press (OUP), 2021.

Abstract

Background Accurate prediction of mortality in heart failure (HF) patients is crucial for decision-making regarding HF therapies, but a strategy for the prediction of mortality in elderly HF patients has not been established. In addition, although favorable effects of comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation (CR) on clinical outcomes and functional status in HF patients have been demonstrated, a goal of comprehensive CR during hospitalization for reducing mortality remains unclear. Aims We examined whether assessment of basic activities of daily living (ADL) by the Barthel Index (BI), the most widely used tool for assessment of basic ADL, is useful for predicting all-cause mortality in elderly HF patients who received comprehensive CR. Methods This study was a single-center, retrospective and observational study. We retrospectively examined 413 HF patients aged ≥65 years (mean age, 78±7 years; 50% female) who were admitted to our institute for management of HF and received comprehensive CR during hospitalization. Functional status for performing basic ADL ability was assessed by the BI within 3 days before discharge. The clinical endpoint was all-cause death during the follow-up period. Results Of 413 HF patients, 116 patients (28%) died during a follow-up period of median 1.90-years (interquartile range, 1.20–3.23 years). Results of an adjusted dose-dependent association analysis showed that the hazard ratio (HR) of mortality increases in an almost linear fashion as the BI score decreases and that the BI score corresponding the hazard ratio of 1.0 is 85 (Figure A). To minimize the differences in potential confounding factors between patient with low BI ( Conclusion A BI score of Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science

Details

ISSN :
15229645 and 0195668X
Volume :
42
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
European Heart Journal
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....cd839c5d85684fe50125d66b612c351b
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehab724.2809