Back to Search Start Over

Echocardiographic measurements of epicardial adipose tissue and comparative ability to predict adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease

Authors :
Rolando Hernández-Muñoz
Rebeca Pérez-Cabeza de Vaca
Rafael Trujillo-Cortés
Mani A. Vannan
Paul Mondragón-Terán
Rocío Aceves-Millán
Juan Ángel Peraza-Zaldivar
Julieta D Morales-Portano
Alberto Francisco Rubio-Guerra
Alberto Melchor-López
Lilia Amezcua-Gómez
Carlos Haroldo Ixcamparij-Rosales
Rogelio Robledo-Nolasco
Juan Antonio Suárez-Cuenca
Source :
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
Publication Year :
2018
Publisher :
Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2018.

Abstract

The present study aimed to compare echocardiography measurements of epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) thickness and other risk factors regarding their ability to predict adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Outcomes of 107 patients (86 males, 21 females, mean age 63.6 years old) submitted to diagnostic echocardiography and coronary angiography were prospectively analyzed. EAT (measures over the right ventricle, interventricular groove and complete bulk of EAT) and left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) were performed by echocardiography. Coronary complexity was evaluated by Syntax score. Primary endpoints were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE’s), composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, unstable angina, intra-stent re-stenosis and episodes of decompensate heart failure requiring hospital attention during a mean follow up of 15.94 ± 3.6 months. Mean EAT thickness was 4.6 ± 1.9 mm; and correlated with Syntax score and body mass index; negatively correlated with LVEF. Twenty-three cases of MACE's were recorded during follow up, who showed higher EAT. Diagnostic ability of EAT to discriminate MACE's was comparable to LVEF (AUROC > 0.5); but higher than Syntax score. Quartile comparison of EAT revealed that measurement of the complete bulk of EAT provided a better discrimination range for MACE's, and higher, more significant adjusted risk (cutoff 4.6 mm, RR = 3.91; 95% CI 1.01–15.08; p = 0.04) than the other risk factors. We concluded that echocardiographic measurement of EAT showed higher predicting ability for MACE’s than the other markers tested, in patients with CAD. Whether location for echocardiographic measurement of EAT impacts the diagnostic performance of this method deserves further study.

Details

ISSN :
15730743 and 15695794
Volume :
34
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....cd1b3555f8db842cbe28cfe7750ce803
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-018-1360-y