Back to Search Start Over

The Dependence of the Type Ia Supernova Host Bias on Observation or Fitting Technique

Authors :
Jared Hand
Shu Liu
Lluís Galbany
Daniel Perrefort
W. M. Wood-Vasey
Chris Burns
Department of Energy (US)
Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (España)
Agencia Estatal de Investigación (España)
Source :
Digital.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC, instname
Publication Year :
2022
Publisher :
IOP Publishing, 2022.

Abstract

More luminous Type Ia supernovae prefer less massive hosts and regions of higher star formation. This correlation is inverted during width-color-luminosity light-curve standardization resulting in step-like biases of distance measurements with respect to host properties. Using the PMAS/PPak Integral-field Supernovahosts COmpilation (PISCO) supernova host sample and Sloan Digital Sky Survey, Galaxy Evolution Explorer, and Two Micron All Sky Survey photometry, we compare host stellar mass and specific star-formation rate (sSFR) from different observation methods, including local versus global, and fitting techniques to measure their impact on the host step biases. Mass-step measurements for all our mass samples are consistent within a 1σ significance from -0.03 ± 0.02 mag to -0.04 ± 0.02 mag. Including or excluding UV information had no effect on measured mass-step size or location. sSFR step sizes are more significant than mass-step measurements and varied from 0.05 ± 0.03 mag (Hα) and 0.06 ± 0.02 mag (UV) for a 51 host sample. The sSFR step location is influenced by the mass sample used to normalize star formation and by sSFR tracer choice. The step size is reduced to 0.04 ± 0.03 mag when using all available 73 hosts with Hα measurements. This 73 PISCO host subsample overall lacked a clear step signal, but here we are searching for whether different choices of mass or sSFR estimation can create a step signal. We find no evidence that different observation or fitting techniques choices can create a distance measurement step in either mass or sSFR.<br />This work was supported in part by the US Department of Energy Office of Science under DE-SC0007914. The authors thank the referee for their time, patience, and valued input in reviewing this paper in its submissions. The authors thank the Carnegie Supernova Project II for generously sharing the SALT2 fits for unpublished SNe Ia whose hosts were part of the PISCO sample. The authors would also like to thank Dr. Alex Kim for both the introduction to and guidance using Stan. L.G. acknowledges financial support from the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (MCIN), the Agencia Estatal de Investigación (AEI) 10.13039/501100011033, and by the European Social Fund (ESF) "Investing in your future" under the 2019 Ramón y Cajal program RYC2019-027683-I and the PID2020-115253GA-I00 HOSTFLOWS project.

Details

Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Digital.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC, instname
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....cd199c045028ae3e3a6b6ee99f188911