Biomechanical evaluation of 2 techniques of repair after subscapularis peel for stemless shoulder arthroplasty

Background Stemless anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) has been gaining significant popularity but poses unique challenges for subscapularis repair. Tenotomy with side-to-side repair has been the most frequently reported technique for subscapularis repair with stemless TSA but has the poorest biomechanical properties, and clinical failures have been reported. There is limited biomechanical evidence evaluating other subscapularis repair techniques for stemless TSA. Therefore, the goal of this study was to investigate 2 additional techniques using a subscapularis peel for subscapularis repair with a stemless TSA. Methods We used 18 male cadaveric specimens to investigate the native subscapularis (n = 6) and 2 subscapularis repair techniques (n = 12) after stemless anatomic TSA (Eclipse). A subscapularis peel with double-row, knotless anchor–based repair (n = 6) was compared with a subscapularis peel with a “backpack” repair (n = 6). The specimens then underwent biomechanical testing, including cyclic displacement and load-to-failure testing. The mode of failure was also recorded. Results The native tendon had the highest ultimate load to failure (mean, 1017.1 N). Load to failure was similar between the 2 study groups: 397.9 N for the peel and backpack repair and 593.7 N for the knotless anchor–based repair (P > .05 for all comparisons). Moreover, no significant differences in cyclic displacement or construct stiffness were found between the groups (P > .05 for all comparisons). Conclusions A double-row, knotless anchor–based repair of a subscapularis peel for stemless anatomic shoulder arthroplasty has similar biomechanical properties to a backpack repair technique; however, both techniques fail to reproduce the native biomechanical properties at time zero.