Back to Search Start Over

Patient pathway analysis of tuberculosis diagnostic delay: a multicentre retrospective cohort study in China

Authors :
Li-Jun Han
Fu-Li Huang
Taoping Weng
Yong-Guo Li
Hui-Mei Liu
Hongying Yu
Long-Zhi Wang
Yuanyuan Liu
Feng Sun
Lu Zhang
Guo-Fang Deng
Tao Li
Hongyu Wang
Ke Lin
Ji-Wang Chen
Yuan-Yuan Chen
Yang Li
Jian-Nan Lv
Wenhong Zhang
Zhe Zhou
Wei Tang
Qun Deng
Peng-Fei Ren
Fan Xia
Yonglan Pu
Lei Bao
Zheng-Hui Huang
Guiqing He
Cui Cai
Source :
Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. 27(7)
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Objectives Delay in diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) is an important but under-appreciated problem. Our study aimed to analyse the patient pathway and possible risk factors of long diagnostic delay (LDD). Methods We enrolled 400 new bacteriologically diagnosed patients with pulmonary TB from 20 hospitals across China. LDD was defined as an interval between the initial care visit and the confirmation of diagnosis exceeding 14 days. Its potential risk factors were investigated by multivariate logistic regression and multilevel logistic regression. Hospitals in China were classified by increasing size, from level 0 to level 3. TB laboratory equipment in hospitals was also evaluated. Results The median diagnostic delay was 20 days (IQR: 7–72 days), and 229 of 400 patients (57.3%, 95%CI 52.4–62.1) had LDD; 15% of participants were diagnosed at the initial care visit. Compared to level 0 facilities, choosing level 2 (OR 0.27, 95%CI 0.12–0.62, p 0.002) and level 3 facilities (OR 0.34, 95%CI 0.14–0.84, p 0.019) for the initial care visit was independently associated with shorter LDD. Equipping with smear, culture, and Xpert at initial care visit simultaneously also helped to avoid LDD (OR 0.28, 95%CI 0.09–0.82, p 0.020). The multilevel logistic regression yielded similar results. Availability of smear, culture, and Xpert was lower in level 0–1 facilities than in level 2–3 facilities (p Conclusions Most patients failed to be diagnosed at the initial care visit. Patients who went to low-level facilities initially had a higher risk of LDD. Improvement of TB laboratory equipment, especially at low-level facilities, is urgently needed.

Details

ISSN :
14690691
Volume :
27
Issue :
7
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....cbbbb6497d553b23bc483d674c22d9e9