Back to Search Start Over

Assessment of genetically modified maize MZHG0JG for food and feed uses, import and processing under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA-GMO-DE-2016-133)

Authors :
EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO)
Naegeli, H
Bresson, J-L
Dalmay, T
Dewhurst, IC
Epstein, MM
Firbank, LG
Guerche, P
Hejatko, J
Moreno, FJ
Mullins, E
Nogué, F
Rostoks, N
Serrano, JJS
Savoini, G
Veromann, E
Veronesi, F
Devos, Y
Ardizzone, M
Neri, FM
Papadopoulou, N
De Sanctis, G
Dumont, AF
Gennaro, A
Ruiz, JAG
Paraskevopoulos, K
Institut Jean-Pierre Bourgin (IJPB)
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-AgroParisTech
UAR 1171 Soutien aux Projets Européens
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)
Source :
Digital.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC, instname, EFSA Journal, EFSA Journal, European Food Safety Authority, 2018, 16 (11), pp.e5469. ⟨10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5469⟩, EFSA Journal, Vol 16, Iss 11, Pp n/a-n/a (2018)
Publication Year :
2018
Publisher :
John Wiley & Sons, 2018.

Abstract

The scope of application EFSA-GMO-DE-2016-133 is for food and feed uses, import and processing ofgenetically modified (GM) maize MZHG0JG in the European Union. Maize MZHG0JG was developed toconfer tolerance to the herbicidal active substances glyphosate and glufosinate-ammonium. Themolecular characterisation data and bioinformatic analyses do not identify issues requiring food/feedsafety assessment. None of the identified differences in the agronomic/phenotypic and compositionalcharacteristics tested between maize MZHG0JG and its conventional counterpart needs furtherassessment, except for early stand count (pre-thinning). The GMO Panel does not identify safetyconcerns regarding the toxicity and allergenicity of the mEPSPS and PAT proteins as expressed inmaize MZHG0JG, andfinds no evidence that the genetic modification would change the overallallergenicity of maize MZHG0JG. The nutritional impact of food/feed derived from maize MZHG0JG isexpected to be the same as that of food/feed derived from the conventional counterpart andcommercial non-GM maize reference varieties. The GMO Panel concludes that maize MZHG0JG isnutritionally equivalent to and as safe as the conventional counterpart and non-GM maize referencevarieties tested, and no post-market monitoring of food/feed is considered necessary. In the case ofaccidental release of viable maize MZHG0JG grains into the environment, maize MZHG0JG would notraise environmental safety concerns. The post-market environmental monitoring plan and reportingintervals are in line with the intended uses of maize MZHG0JG. In conclusion, the GMO Panel considersthat maize MZHG0JG, as described in this application, is as safe as its conventional counterpart andthe tested non-GM maize reference varieties with respect to potential effects on human and animalhealth and the environment.

Details

ISSN :
18314732 and 23149396
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Digital.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC, instname, EFSA Journal, EFSA Journal, European Food Safety Authority, 2018, 16 (11), pp.e5469. ⟨10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5469⟩, EFSA Journal, Vol 16, Iss 11, Pp n/a-n/a (2018)
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....cb7de52d9f5d5a796da25c3d3310216e