Back to Search Start Over

Ultrasound-Assisted Liposuction Does Not Compromise the Regenerative Potential of Adipose-Derived Stem Cells

Authors :
Michael S. Pollhammer
David Atashroo
Alexander J. Whittam
Zeshaan N. Maan
Hans-Günther Machens
Elizabeth R. Zielins
Michael S. Hu
Manfred Schmidt
Georg M. Huemer
Anna Luan
Janos A. Barrera
Graham G. Walmsley
Dominik Duscher
Derrick C. Wan
Sacha M.L. Khong
Arndt F. Schilling
Geoffrey C. Gurtner
Michael T. Longaker
Elizabeth A. Brett
Source :
Stem Cells Translational Medicine
Publication Year :
2015
Publisher :
Oxford University Press (OUP), 2015.

Abstract

The regenerative abilities of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ASCs) harvested via a third-generation ultrasound-assisted liposuction (UAL) device versus ASCs obtained via standard suction-assisted lipoaspiration were evaluated. ASC yield and viability, and expression of most osteogenic, adipogenic, and key regenerative genes were equivalent between the two methods. Cells harvested via UAL showed comparable abilities to enhance cutaneous regeneration and appear suitable for cell therapy and tissue engineering applications.<br />Human mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have recently become a focus of regenerative medicine, both for their multilineage differentiation capacity and their excretion of proregenerative cytokines. Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ASCs) are of particular interest because of their abundance in fat tissue and the ease of harvest via liposuction. However, little is known about the impact of different liposuction methods on the functionality of ASCs. Here we evaluate the regenerative abilities of ASCs harvested via a third-generation ultrasound-assisted liposuction (UAL) device versus ASCs obtained via standard suction-assisted lipoaspiration (SAL). Lipoaspirates were sorted using fluorescent assisted cell sorting based on an established surface-marker profile (CD34+/CD31−/CD45−), to obtain viable ASCs. Yield and viability were compared and the differentiation capacities of the ASCs were assessed. Finally, the regenerative potential of ASCs was examined using an in vivo model of tissue regeneration. UAL- and SAL-derived samples demonstrated equivalent ASC yield and viability, and UAL ASCs were not impaired in their osteogenic, adipogenic, or chondrogenic differentiation capacity. Equally, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction showed comparable expression of most osteogenic, adipogenic, and key regenerative genes between both ASC groups. Cutaneous regeneration and neovascularization were significantly enhanced in mice treated with ASCs obtained by either UAL or SAL compared with controls, but there were no significant differences in healing between cell-therapy groups. We conclude that UAL is a successful method of obtaining fully functional ASCs for regenerative medicine purposes. Cells harvested with this alternative approach to liposuction are suitable for cell therapy and tissue engineering applications. Significance Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ASCs) are an appealing source of therapeutic progenitor cells because of their multipotency, diverse cytokine profile, and ease of harvest via liposuction. Alternative approaches to classical suction-assisted liposuction are gaining popularity; however, little evidence exists regarding the impact of different liposuction methods on the regenerative functionality of ASCs. Human ASC characteristics and regenerative capacity were assessed when harvested via ultrasound-assisted (UAL) versus standard suction-assisted liposuction. ASCs obtained via UAL were of equal quality when directly compared with the current gold standard harvest method. UAL is an adjunctive source of fully functional mesenchymal stem cells for applications in basic research and clinical therapy.

Details

ISSN :
21576580 and 21576564
Volume :
5
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Stem Cells Translational Medicine
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....cb492c3f5416b436ff5d5371a0303a33