Back to Search Start Over

Standard vs double dose of N-acetylcysteine to prevent contrast agent associated nephrotoxicity

Authors :
Carlo Briguori
P. P. Elia
Antonio Colombo
Guido Riviezzo
Mariateresa Librera
Bruno Ricciardelli
Pasquale Balestrieri
Stefano Lepore
Amelia Focaccio
Fiore Manganelli
Anna Violante
Bruno Golia
Pierfranco Scarpato
Erminio Bonizzoni
Source :
European Heart Journal. 25:206-211
Publication Year :
2004
Publisher :
Oxford University Press (OUP), 2004.

Abstract

Prophylactic administration of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) (600mg orally twice daily), along with hydration, prevents contrast agent-associated nephrotoxicity (CAN) induced by a low dose of non-ionic, low-osmolality contrast dye. We tested whether a double dose of NAC is more effective to prevent CAN.Two-hundred-twenty-four consecutive patients with chronic renal insufficiency (creatinine levelor =1.5mg/dl and/or creatinine clearance60ml/min), referred to our institution for coronary and/or peripheral procedures, were randomly assigned to receive 0.45% saline intravenously and NAC at the standard dose (600mg orally twice daily; SD Group; n=110) or at a double dose (1200mg orally twice daily; DD Group; n=114) before and after a non-ionic, low-osmolality contrast dye administration. Increase of at least 0.5mg/dl of the creatinine concentration 48h after the procedure occurred in 12/109 patients (11%) in the SD Group and 4/114 patients (3.5%) in the DD Group (P=0.038; OR=0.29; 95% CI=0.09-0.94). In the subgroup with low (140ml, or contrast ratio=1) contrast dose, no significant difference in renal function deterioration occurred between the 2 groups. In the subgroup with high (or =140ml, or contrast ratio1) contrast dose, the event was significantly more frequent in the SD Group. Conclusions Double dose of NAC seems to be more effective than the standard dose in preventing CAN, especially with high volumes of non-ionic, low-osmolality contrast agent.

Details

ISSN :
0195668X
Volume :
25
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
European Heart Journal
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....cac4c3ea51bc5714457b8d7261ec43d6
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ehj.2003.11.016