Back to Search
Start Over
Factors Influencing IACUC Decision Making: Who Leads the Discussions?
- Source :
- Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE. 12(4)
- Publication Year :
- 2017
-
Abstract
- Decisions about the appropriate use of animals in research are largely made by Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees (IACUCs). Several commentators claim that scientists exert excessive influence on IACUC decisions. We studied 87 protocol reviews from 10 IACUCs to assess whether any group of participants appeared to dominate the protocol discussions. Audio recordings of the meetings were coded to capture the topics of the discussions. We found that animal research scientists made the largest total number of topic mentions while community members made the fewest. On a per person basis, chairpersons and attending veterinarians made the most mentions. Scientists presented the largest number of protocols, and the subsequent discussions tended to contain the same topics mentioned in the presentations. The large number of protocols presented by scientists and their total number of comments made during protocol discussions suggest that scientists may significantly influence IACUC decision making.
- Subjects :
- Research design
Animal Experimentation
Social Psychology
Decision Making
0603 philosophy, ethics and religion
Appropriate use
Animal Welfare
Article
Education
Ethics, Research
Veterinarians
Residence Characteristics
Stakeholder Participation
Animal welfare
Humans
0501 psychology and cognitive sciences
050102 behavioral science & comparative psychology
Ethical Review
Research review
Protocol (science)
Research ethics
Medical education
Animal Care Committees
Communication
05 social sciences
06 humanities and the arts
Research Personnel
Research Design
060301 applied ethics
Psychology
Qualitative research
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 15562654
- Volume :
- 12
- Issue :
- 4
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....ca9b78ad8b0e92894cc17d4dc06dc2c6