Back to Search Start Over

Lung ultrasound findings following COVID-19 hospitalization: A prospective longitudinal cohort study

Authors :
Caroline Espersen
Elke Platz
Alia Saed Alhakak
Morten Sengeløv
Jakob Øystein Simonsen
Niklas Dyrby Johansen
Filip Søskov Davidovski
Jacob Christensen
Henning Bundgaard
Christian Hassager
Reza Jabbari
Jørn Carlsen
Ole Kirk
Matias Greve Lindholm
Ole Peter Kristiansen
Olav Wendelboe Nielsen
Klaus Nielsen Jeschke
Charlotte Suppli Ulrik
Pradeesh Sivapalan
Kasper Iversen
Jens Ulrik Stæhr Jensen
Morten Schou
Søren Helbo Skaarup
Mats Christian Højbjerg Lassen
Kristoffer Grundtvig Skaarup
Tor Biering-Sørensen
Source :
Espersen, C, Platz, E, Alhakak, A S, Sengeløv, M, Simonsen, J Ø, Johansen, N D, Davidovski, F S, Christensen, J, Bundgaard, H, Hassager, C, Jabbari, R, Carlsen, J, Kirk, O, Lindholm, M G, Kristiansen, O P, Nielsen, O W, Jeschke, K N, Ulrik, C S, Sivapalan, P, Iversen, K, Stæhr Jensen, J U, Schou, M, Skaarup, S H, Højbjerg Lassen, M C, Skaarup, K G & Biering-Sørensen, T 2022, ' Lung ultrasound findings following COVID-19 hospitalization : A prospective longitudinal cohort study ', Respiratory Medicine, vol. 197, 106826 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmed.2022.106826
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Background: Lung ultrasound (LUS) is a useful tool for diagnosis and monitoring in patients with active COVID-19-infection. However, less is known about the changes in LUS findings after a hospitalization for COVID-19. Methods: In a prospective, longitudinal study in patients with COVID-19 enrolled from non-ICU hospital units, adult patients underwent 8-zone LUS and blood sampling both during the hospitalization and 2–3 months after discharge. LUS images were analyzed blinded to clinical variables and outcomes. Results: A total of 71 patients with interpretable LUS at baseline and follow up (mean age 64 years, 61% male, 24% with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)) were included. The follow-up LUS was performed a median of 72 days after the initial LUS performed during hospitalization. At baseline, 87% had pathologic LUS findings in ≥1 zone (e.g. ≥3 B-lines, confluent B-lines or subpleural or lobar consolidation), whereas 30% had pathologic findings at follow-up (p < 0.001). The total number of B-lines and LUS score decreased significantly from hospitalization to follow-up (median 17 vs. 4, p < 0.001 and 4 vs. 0, p < 0.001, respectively). On the follow-up LUS, 28% of all patients had ≥3 B-lines in ≥1 zone, whereas in those with ARDS during the baseline hospitalization (n = 17), 47% had ≥3 B-lines in ≥1 zone. Conclusion: LUS findings improved significantly from hospitalization to follow-up 2–3 months after discharge in COVID-19 survivors. However, persistent B-lines were frequent at follow-up, especially among those who initially had ARDS. LUS seems to be a promising method to monitor COVID-19 lung changes over time. Clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT04377035.

Details

ISSN :
15323064
Volume :
197
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Respiratory medicine
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....ca701c43af0a70ef871567bd1fb3c622
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmed.2022.106826