Back to Search Start Over

β-diversity scaling patterns are consistent across metrics and taxa

Authors :
Brian J. McGill
Maria Dornelas
Laura H. Antão
Anne E. Magurran
Amadeu M.V.M. Soares
The Wellcome Trust
European Research Council
University of St Andrews. School of Biology
University of St Andrews. Centre for Biological Diversity
University of St Andrews. Marine Alliance for Science & Technology Scotland
University of St Andrews. Scottish Oceans Institute
University of St Andrews. Institute of Behavioural and Neural Sciences
University of St Andrews. St Andrews Sustainability Institute
University of St Andrews. Fish Behaviour and Biodiversity Research Group
University of St Andrews. Centre for Research into Ecological & Environmental Modelling
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

We thank the University of St Andrews Bioinformatics Unit (Wellcome Trust ISSF grant 105621/Z/14/Z). L.H.A.was supported by Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia, Portugal (POPH/FSE SFRH/BD/90469/2012), A.E.M. by the ERC BioTIME (250189) and BioCHANGE (727440), and B.J.M. by USDA Hatch grant to MAFES #1011538 and NSF ABI grant #1660000. The BioTIME database was funded by ERC AdG BioTIME (250189) and ERC PoC BioCHANGE (727440). β‐diversity (variation in community composition) is a fundamental component of biodiversity, with implications for macroecology, community ecology and conservation. However, its scaling properties are poorly understood. Here, we systematically assessed the spatial scaling of β‐diversity using 12 empirical large‐scale datasets including different taxonomic groups, by examining two conceptual types of β‐diversity and explicitly considering the turnover and nestedness components. We found highly consistent patterns across datasets. Multiple‐site β‐diversity (i.e. variation across multiple sites) scaling curves were remarkably consistent, with β‐diversity decreasing with sampled area according to a power law. For pairwise dissimilarities, the rates of increase of dissimilarity with geographic distance remained largely constant across scales, while grain size (or scale level) had a stronger effect on overall dissimilarity. In both analyses, turnover was the main contributor to β‐diversity, following total β‐diversity patterns closely, while the nestedness component was largely insensitive to scale changes. Our results highlight the importance of integrating both inter‐ and intraspecific aggregation patterns across spatial scales, which underpin substantial differences in community structure from local to regional scales. Postprint

Details

Language :
English
Database :
OpenAIRE
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....ca04798e867f15c17729c00b80e29f4d