Back to Search Start Over

Quality of life with talazoparib versus physician’s choice of chemotherapy in patients with advanced breast cancer and germline BRCA1/2 mutation: patient-reported outcomes from the EMBRACA phase III trial

Authors :
H. Bhattacharyya
Kyung-Hun Lee
Henri Roché
Alison L. Hannah
Hope S. Rugo
Ruben G.W. Quek
Denka Markova
Johannes Ettl
Joanne L. Blum
A. Goncalves
Lida A. Mina
Wolfgang Eiermann
Miguel Martin
Yunjoo Im
Rinat Yerushalmi
Louis Fehrenbacher
Sara A. Hurvitz
Jennifer K. Litton
Source :
Annals of Oncology. 29:1939-1947
Publication Year :
2018
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2018.

Abstract

In the EMBRACA phase III trial, talazoparib (1 mg daily, orally) demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in PFS versus physician's choice of chemotherapy (PCT; capecitabine, eribulin, gemcitabine, or vinorelbine) in patients with HER2-negative advanced breast cancer carrying a germline BRCA1/2 mutation; we evaluated patient-reported outcomes (PROs).Patients were randomized 2 : 1 to receive talazoparib or PCT. PROs were assessed at day 1 (baseline), the start of each treatment cycle (every 3 weeks), and at the end of treatment, using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-30) and its breast cancer module, QLQ-BR23. Prespecified exploratory analyses included a longitudinal mixed-effect model comparing treatment arms and a time to definitive clinically meaningful deterioration (TTD) analysis carried out in the global health status/quality of life (GHS/QoL), and all functional and symptom scales from the EORTC QLQ-C30 and -BR23 questionnaires. Between-arm TTD comparisons were made using a stratified log-rank test and a Cox proportional hazards model.Baseline scores were similar between arms. Statistically significant estimated overall improvement from baseline in GHS/QoL was seen for talazoparib compared with statistically significant deterioration for PCT {3.0 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2, 4.8] versus -5.4 [95% CI -8.8, -2.0]; between arms, P 0.0001}. A statistically significant greater delay was observed in TTD in GHS/QoL, favoring talazoparib over PCT [hazard ratio, 0.38 (95% CI 0.26, 0.55; median, 24.3 versus 6.3 months, respectively; P 0.0001)]. A statistically significant overall change and a statistically significant delay in TTD, all favoring talazoparib, were also observed in multiple functions and symptoms.Patients who received talazoparib had significant overall improvements and significant delay in TTD in multiple cancer-related and breast cancer-specific symptoms, functions, and GHS/QoL.NCT01945775.

Details

ISSN :
09237534
Volume :
29
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Annals of Oncology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....c958fd124d96285faa3983d043947979
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdy257