Back to Search Start Over

Leptomeningeal enhancement in multiple sclerosis and other neurological diseases: A systematic review and Meta-Analysis

Authors :
Benjamin V. Ineichen
Charidimos Tsagkas
Martina Absinta
Daniel S. Reich
University of Zurich
Source :
NeuroImage : Clinical, NeuroImage: Clinical, Vol 33, Iss, Pp 102939-(2022)
Publication Year :
2022
Publisher :
Elsevier, 2022.

Abstract

Highlights • Leptomeningeal enhancement (LME) is a nonspecific imaging feature. • LME can be present in neoplastic, infectious, and primary neuroinflammatory diseases. • The presence of LME is associated with worse outcome measures in multiple sclerosis. • We recommend the ascertainment of LME in clinical practice. • Neuroinflammatory animal models can be used to investigate the pathophysiology of LME.<br />Background The lack of systematic evidence on leptomeningeal enhancement (LME) on MRI in neurological diseases, including multiple sclerosis (MS), hampers its interpretation in clinical routine and research settings. Purpose To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of MRI LME in MS and other neurological diseases. Materials and Methods In a comprehensive literature search in Medline, Scopus, and Embase, out of 2292 publications, 459 records assessing LME in neurological diseases were eligible for qualitative synthesis. Of these, 135 were included in a random-effects model meta-analysis with subgroup analyses for MS. Results Of eligible publications, 161 investigated LME in neoplastic neurological (n = 2392), 91 in neuroinfectious (n = 1890), and 75 in primary neuroinflammatory diseases (n = 4038). The LME-proportions for these disease classes were 0.47 [95%-CI: 0.37–0.57], 0.59 [95%-CI: 0.47–0.69], and 0.26 [95%-CI: 0.20–0.35], respectively. In a subgroup analysis comprising 1605 MS cases, LME proportion was 0.30 [95%-CI 0.21–0.42] with lower proportions in relapsing-remitting (0.19 [95%-CI 0.13–0.27]) compared to progressive MS (0.39 [95%-CI 0.30–0.49], p = 0.002) and higher proportions in studies imaging at 7 T (0.79 [95%-CI 0.64–0.89]) compared to lower field strengths (0.21 [95%-CI 0.15–0.29], p

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
22131582 and 42021235
Volume :
33
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
NeuroImage : Clinical
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....c894a0d787c1d6543119c8c0eba6ba86