Back to Search Start Over

Utility of multiple rule out CT screening of high-risk atraumatic patients in an emergency department—a feasibility study

Authors :
Shazia Rehman
Michel C. Nèmery
Bijan Rezanavaz-Gheshlagh
Rasmus Bo Hasselbalch
Erik Andersen
Henriette Raaschou
Mariana Kristensen
Kasper Iversen
Hanne Heebøll
Mia Pries-Heje
Lisbet Ravn
Morten Lind
Peter Sommer Ulriksen
Thomas Boel
Source :
Emergency Radiology. 25:357-365
Publication Year :
2018
Publisher :
Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2018.

Abstract

Several large trials have evaluated the effect of CT screening based on specific symptoms, with varying outcomes. Screening of patients with CT based on their prognosis alone has not been examined before. For moderate-to-high risk patients presenting in the emergency department (ED), the potential gain from a CT scan might outweigh the risk of radiation exposure. We hypothesized that an accelerated “multiple rule out” CT screening of moderate-to-high risk patients will detect many clinically unrecognized diagnoses that affect change in treatment. Patients ≥ 40 years, triaged as high-risk or moderate-to-high risk according to vital signs, were eligible for inclusion. Patients were scanned with a combined ECG-gated and dual energy CT scan of cerebrum, thorax, and abdomen. The impact of the CT scan on patient diagnosis and treatment was examined prospectively by an expert panel. A total of 100 patients were included in the study, (53% female, mean age 73 years [age range, 43–93]). The scan lead to change in treatment or additional examinations in 37 (37%) patients, of which 24 (24%) were diagnostically significant, change in acute treatment in 11 (11%) cases and previously unrecognized malignant tumors in 10 (10%) cases. The mean size specific radiation dose was 15.9 mSv (± 3.1 mSv). Screening with a multi-rule out CT scan of high-risk patients in an ED is feasible and result in discovery of clinically unrecognized diagnoses and malignant tumors, but at the cost of radiation exposure and downstream examinations. The clinical impact of these findings should be evaluated in a larger randomized cohort.

Details

ISSN :
14381435 and 10703004
Volume :
25
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Emergency Radiology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....c88a48d830da8a1b9d5d6e08d402d6e8
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-018-1584-0