Back to Search
Start Over
COVID-19: Rapid antigen detection for SARS-CoV-2 by lateral flow assay: A national systematic evaluation of sensitivity and specificity for mass-testing
- Source :
- UK COVID-19 Lateral Flow Oversight Team 2021, ' COVID-19 : Rapid antigen detection for SARS-CoV-2 by lateral flow assay: A national systematic evaluation of sensitivity and specificity for mass-testing ', EClinicalMedicine . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100924, EClinicalMedicine
- Publication Year :
- 2021
- Publisher :
- Elsevier BV, 2021.
-
Abstract
- Background Lateral flow device (LFD) viral antigen immunoassays have been developed around the world as diagnostic tests for SARS-CoV-2 infection. They have been proposed to deliver an infrastructure-light, cost-economical solution giving results within half an hour. Methods LFDs were initially reviewed by a Department of Health and Social Care team, part of the UK government, from which 64 were selected for further evaluation from 1st August to 15th December 2020. Standardised laboratory evaluations, and for those that met the published criteria, field testing in the Falcon-C19 research study and UK pilots were performed (UK COVID-19 testing centres, hospital, schools, armed forces). Findings 4/64 LFDs so far have desirable performance characteristics (orient Gene, Deepblue, Abbott and Innova SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Rapid Qualitative Test). All these LFDs have a viral antigen detection of >90% at 100,000 RNA copies/ml. 8951 Innova LFD tests were performed with a kit failure rate of 5.6% (502/8951, 95% CI: 5.1–6.1), false positive rate of 0.32% (22/6954, 95% CI: 0.20–0.48). Viral antigen detection/sensitivity across the sampling cohort when performed by laboratory scientists was 78.8% (156/198, 95% CI 72.4–84.3). Interpretation Our results suggest LFDs have promising performance characteristics for mass population testing and can be used to identify infectious positive individuals. The Innova LFD shows good viral antigen detection/sensitivity with excellent specificity, although kit failure rates and the impact of training are potential issues. These results support the expanded evaluation of LFDs, and assessment of greater access to testing on COVID-19 transmission. Funding Department of Health and Social Care. University of Oxford. Public Health England Porton Down, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, National Institute of Health Research.
- Subjects :
- VIral antigen detection
medicine.medical_specialty
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)
LFD
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)
Testing
Population
National evaluation
01 natural sciences
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Antigen
Lateralflow devices
Lateral flow tests
Medicine
Sampling (medicine)
030212 general & internal medicine
0101 mathematics
education
Lateral flow
Public health
education.field_of_study
SARS-CoV-2
business.industry
010102 general mathematics
COVID-19
General Medicine
Coronavirus
United kingdom
Cohort
Emergency medicine
False positive rate
business
Research Paper
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 25895370
- Volume :
- 36
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- EClinicalMedicine
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....c87b9c21c171152daba6af29c9c6e7c8