Back to Search
Start Over
Inequity in consumption of goods and services adds to racial-ethnic disparities in air pollution exposure
- Source :
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol 116, iss 13, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
- Publication Year :
- 2019
- Publisher :
- eScholarship, University of California, 2019.
-
Abstract
- Significance Racial–ethnic disparities in pollution exposure and in consumption of goods and services in the United States are well documented. Some may find it intuitive that, on average, black and Hispanic minorities bear a disproportionate burden from the air pollution caused mainly by non-Hispanic whites, but this effect has not previously been directly established, let alone quantified. Our “pollution inequity” metric is generalizable to other pollution types and provides a simple and intuitive way of expressing a disparity between the pollution that people cause and the pollution to which they are exposed. Our results are timely, given public debate on issues relating to race, equity, and the regulation of pollution.<br />Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) air pollution exposure is the largest environmental health risk factor in the United States. Here, we link PM2.5 exposure to the human activities responsible for PM2.5 pollution. We use these results to explore “pollution inequity”: the difference between the environmental health damage caused by a racial–ethnic group and the damage that group experiences. We show that, in the United States, PM2.5 exposure is disproportionately caused by consumption of goods and services mainly by the non-Hispanic white majority, but disproportionately inhaled by black and Hispanic minorities. On average, non-Hispanic whites experience a “pollution advantage”: They experience ∼17% less air pollution exposure than is caused by their consumption. Blacks and Hispanics on average bear a “pollution burden” of 56% and 63% excess exposure, respectively, relative to the exposure caused by their consumption. The total disparity is caused as much by how much people consume as by how much pollution they breathe. Differences in the types of goods and services consumed by each group are less important. PM2.5 exposures declined ∼50% during 2002–2015 for all three racial–ethnic groups, but pollution inequity has remained high.
- Subjects :
- Pollution
010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences
input-output
Fine particulate
Economics
Air pollution exposure
media_common.quotation_subject
European Continental Ancestry Group
Social Sciences
010501 environmental sciences
01 natural sciences
Sustainability Science
complex mixtures
White People
Goods and services
life cycle assessment
Environmental health
Humans
2.2 Factors relating to the physical environment
Climate-Related Exposures and Conditions
environmental justice
Air quality index
0105 earth and related environmental sciences
media_common
Environmental justice
Consumption (economics)
African Americans
Air Pollutants
Inhalation Exposure
Multidisciplinary
Whites
input–output
Health Status Disparities
Hispanic or Latino
air quality
Racial ethnic
United States
Black or African American
Geography
Socioeconomic Factors
fine particulate matter
Physical Sciences
Particulate Matter
Hispanic Americans
Subjects
Details
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol 116, iss 13, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....c8486196ae71c74057cd2e949e6918bd