Back to Search Start Over

Inequity in consumption of goods and services adds to racial-ethnic disparities in air pollution exposure

Authors :
Nicholas Z. Muller
David Paolella
Nathaniel P. Springer
Julian D. Marshall
Joshua S. Apte
Kimberley A. Mullins
Jason Hill
Andrew L. Goodkind
Christopher W. Tessum
Sumil K. Thakrar
Stephen Polasky
Source :
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol 116, iss 13, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
eScholarship, University of California, 2019.

Abstract

Significance Racial–ethnic disparities in pollution exposure and in consumption of goods and services in the United States are well documented. Some may find it intuitive that, on average, black and Hispanic minorities bear a disproportionate burden from the air pollution caused mainly by non-Hispanic whites, but this effect has not previously been directly established, let alone quantified. Our “pollution inequity” metric is generalizable to other pollution types and provides a simple and intuitive way of expressing a disparity between the pollution that people cause and the pollution to which they are exposed. Our results are timely, given public debate on issues relating to race, equity, and the regulation of pollution.<br />Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) air pollution exposure is the largest environmental health risk factor in the United States. Here, we link PM2.5 exposure to the human activities responsible for PM2.5 pollution. We use these results to explore “pollution inequity”: the difference between the environmental health damage caused by a racial–ethnic group and the damage that group experiences. We show that, in the United States, PM2.5 exposure is disproportionately caused by consumption of goods and services mainly by the non-Hispanic white majority, but disproportionately inhaled by black and Hispanic minorities. On average, non-Hispanic whites experience a “pollution advantage”: They experience ∼17% less air pollution exposure than is caused by their consumption. Blacks and Hispanics on average bear a “pollution burden” of 56% and 63% excess exposure, respectively, relative to the exposure caused by their consumption. The total disparity is caused as much by how much people consume as by how much pollution they breathe. Differences in the types of goods and services consumed by each group are less important. PM2.5 exposures declined ∼50% during 2002–2015 for all three racial–ethnic groups, but pollution inequity has remained high.

Details

Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol 116, iss 13, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....c8486196ae71c74057cd2e949e6918bd