Back to Search Start Over

Heart rate and adverse outcomes in patients with prevalent atrial fibrillation

Authors :
Moschovitis, Giorgio
Johnson, Linda S B
Blum, Steffen
Aeschbacher, Stefanie
De Perna, Maria Luisa
Pagnamenta, Alberto
Mayer Melchiorre, Patrizia Assunta
Benz, Alexander P
Kobza, Richard
Di Valentino, Marcello
Zuern, Christine S
Auricchio, Angelo
Conte, Giulio
Rodondi, Nicolas
Blum, Manuel R
Beer, Juerg H
Kühne, Michael
Osswald, Stefan
Conen, David
Source :
Moschovitis, Giorgio; Johnson, Linda S B; Blum, Steffen; Aeschbacher, Stefanie; De Perna, Maria Luisa; Pagnamenta, Alberto; Mayer Melchiorre, Patrizia Assunta; Benz, Alexander P; Kobza, Richard; Di Valentino, Marcello; Zuern, Christine S; Auricchio, Angelo; Conte, Giulio; Rodondi, Nicolas; Blum, Manuel R; Beer, Juerg H; Kühne, Michael; Osswald, Stefan; Conen, David (2021). Heart rate and adverse outcomes in patients with prevalent atrial fibrillation. Open Heart, 8(1), e001606. B M J Group 10.1136/openhrt-2021-001606
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
B M J Group, 2021.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE The optimal target heart rate in patients with prevalent atrial fibrillation (AF) is not well defined. The aim of this study was to analyse the associations between heart rate and adverse outcomes in a large contemporary cohort of patients with prevalent AF. METHODS From two prospective cohort studies, we included stable AF outpatients who were in AF on the baseline ECG. The main outcome events assessed during prospective follow-up were heart failure hospitalisation, stroke or systemic embolism and death. The associations between heart rate and adverse outcomes were evaluated using multivariable Cox regression models. RESULTS The study population consisted of 1679 patients who had prevalent AF at baseline. Mean age was 74 years, and 24.6% were women. The mean heart rate on the baseline ECG was 78 (±19) beats per minute (bpm). The median follow-up was 3.9 years (IQR 2.2-5.0). Heart rate was not significantly associated with heart failure hospitalisation (adjusted HR (aHR) per 10 bpm increase, 1.00, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.07, p=0.95), stroke or systemic embolism (aHR 0.95, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.07, p=0.38) or death (aHR 1.02, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.09, p=0.66). There was no evidence of a threshold effect for heart rates 100 bpm. CONCLUSIONS In this large contemporary cohort of outpatients with prevalent AF, we found no association between heart rate and adverse outcome events. These data are in line with recommendations that strict heart rate control is not needed in otherwise stable outpatients with AF.

Details

Language :
English
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Moschovitis, Giorgio; Johnson, Linda S B; Blum, Steffen; Aeschbacher, Stefanie; De Perna, Maria Luisa; Pagnamenta, Alberto; Mayer Melchiorre, Patrizia Assunta; Benz, Alexander P; Kobza, Richard; Di Valentino, Marcello; Zuern, Christine S; Auricchio, Angelo; Conte, Giulio; Rodondi, Nicolas; Blum, Manuel R; Beer, Juerg H; K&#252;hne, Michael; Osswald, Stefan; Conen, David (2021). Heart rate and adverse outcomes in patients with prevalent atrial fibrillation. Open Heart, 8(1), e001606. B M J Group 10.1136/openhrt-2021-001606 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2021-001606>
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....c7ea9759ef86caa1bf19d85f158a1344