Back to Search
Start Over
Application of a tool for the evaluation of public and patient involvement in research
- Source :
- BMJ Open
- Publication Year :
- 2015
- Publisher :
- BMJ Publishing Group, 2015.
-
Abstract
- Objectives Public and patient involvement (PPI) is required at all stages of research by many funding bodies such as the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR). Given the high priority of PPI within NIHR programmes and the associated costs, it is important that the process of involvement and impact of PPI on health services research is evaluated. We aimed to develop a tool to quantitatively evaluate the quality of PPI in research from a PPI participant9s perspective in order to inform the researchers about absolute level of quality (cross-sectional aspect) and changes in quality over time (longitudinal aspect). Setting A primary care patient safety translational research centre. Participants The 12 members of the Research User Group (RUG) of Greater Manchester Primary Care Patient Safety Translational Research Centre. Interventions By their own choice each RUG member supported a specific research theme. The level of involvement varied from commenting on documents through to designing their own research projects. Primary and secondary outcome measures planned Measure absolute score and change in score over time in a nine-point Likert score within individuals. Compare Likert scores before undertaking PPI with scores after PPI activities. Evaluate the usefulness of a questionnaire based on a theoretical framework of personal and research factors. Results The questionnaire had an acceptable to good level of internal consistency (Cronbach9s α 0.74–0.81). The majority of the individuals met their initial expectations (11/12) and scored high across all factors. There was no significant change over time in the aggregate score over all factors and all individuals, but there were differences within individuals and factors. A ceiling effect limited the questionnaire9s usefulness to measure increasing scores. Conclusions The questionnaire has been useful in evaluating the early stages of a PPI group and may be generalisable to another setting.
- Subjects :
- medicine.medical_specialty
Quality Assurance, Health Care
media_common.quotation_subject
Psychological intervention
Translational research
STATISTICS & RESEARCH METHODS
Likert scale
Translational Research, Biomedical
Patient safety
PRIMARY CARE
Surveys and Questionnaires
Research Methods
medicine
Humans
Quality (business)
Patient participation
Cooperative Behavior
media_common
business.industry
Research
Health services research
General Medicine
Research Personnel
Family medicine
Ceiling effect
Health Services Research
Patient Participation
business
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 20446055
- Volume :
- 5
- Issue :
- 3
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- BMJ Open
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....c76bfbb1ef23f802c710ef9d08dc32ec