Back to Search Start Over

Empirical Treatment With Carbapenem vs Third-generation Cephalosporin for Treatment of Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis

Authors :
Jung Hwan Yoon
Yun Bin Lee
Eun Ju Cho
Jun Sik Yoon
Dae Hee Choi
Minjong Lee
Moon Young Kim
Jisoo Song
Jeong Hoon Lee
S.-W. Kim
Hee Joon Jang
Su Jong Yu
Yeon Seok Seo
Sung Won Chung
Jin Mo Yang
Minseok Albert Kim
Yong Jin Jung
Cheol Hyung Lee
Jin Myung Park
Jae Seung Lee
Han Ah Lee
Hyunwoo Oh
Yoon Jun Kim
Jun Yong Park
Do Seon Song
Seong Hee Kang
Source :
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 19:976-986.e5
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2021.

Abstract

Background & Aims Third-generation cephalosporins (TGCs) are recommended as first-line antibiotics for treatment of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP). However, antibiotics against multidrug-resistant organisms (such as carbapenems) might be necessary. We aimed to evaluate whether carbapenems are superior to TGC for treatment of SBP. Methods We performed a retrospective study of 865 consecutive patients with a first presentation of SBP (275 culture positive; 103 with TGC-resistant bacterial infections) treated at 7 referral centers in Korea, from September 2013 through January 2018. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. We made all comparisons using data from patients whose baseline characteristics were balanced by inverse probability of treatment weighting. Results Of patients who initially received empirical treatment with antibiotics, 95 (11.0%) received carbapenems and 655 (75.7%) received TGCs. Among the entire study cohort, there was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality between the carbapenem (25.8%) and TGC (25.3%) groups (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.97; 95% CI, 0.85–1.11; P = .66). In the subgroup of patients with high chronic liver failure-sequential organ failure assessment (CLIF-SOFA) scores (score of 7 or greater, n = 314), carbapenem treatment was associated with lower in-hospital mortality (23.1%) than in the TGC group (38.8%) (aOR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.75–0.94; P=.002). In contrast, among patients with lower CLIF-SOFA scores (n = 436), in-hospital mortality did not differ significantly between the carbapenem group (24.7%) and the TGC group (16.0%) (aOR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.85–1.32; P = .58). Conclusions For patients with a first presentation of SBP, empirical treatment with carbapenem does not reduce in-hospital mortality compared to treatment with TGCs. However, among critically ill patients (CLIF-SOFA scores ≥7), empirical carbapenem treatment was significantly associated with lower in-hospital mortality than TGCs.

Details

ISSN :
15423565
Volume :
19
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....c658133539bcd811c939531f4baf2e89
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2020.06.046