Back to Search
Start Over
Risk Assessment, Genetic Counseling, and Genetic Testing for BRCA-Related Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement
- Source :
- JAMA, vol 322, iss 7
- Publication Year :
- 2019
- Publisher :
- eScholarship, University of California, 2019.
-
Abstract
- ImportancePotentially harmful mutations of the breast cancer susceptibility 1 and 2 genes (BRCA1/2) are associated with increased risk for breast, ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancer. For women in the United States, breast cancer is the most common cancer after nonmelanoma skin cancer and the second leading cause of cancer death. In the general population, BRCA1/2 mutations occur in an estimated 1 in 300 to 500 women and account for 5% to 10% of breast cancer cases and 15% of ovarian cancer cases.ObjectiveTo update the 2013 US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation on risk assessment, genetic counseling, and genetic testing for BRCA-related cancer.Evidence reviewThe USPSTF reviewed the evidence on risk assessment, genetic counseling, and genetic testing for potentially harmful BRCA1/2 mutations in asymptomatic women who have never been diagnosed with BRCA-related cancer, as well as those with a previous diagnosis of breast, ovarian, tubal, or peritoneal cancer who have completed treatment and are considered cancer free. In addition, the USPSTF reviewed interventions to reduce the risk for breast, ovarian, tubal, or peritoneal cancer in women with potentially harmful BRCA1/2 mutations, including intensive cancer screening, medications, and risk-reducing surgery.FindingsFor women whose family or personal history is associated with an increased risk for harmful mutations in the BRCA1/2 genes, or who have an ancestry associated with BRCA1/2 gene mutations, there is adequate evidence that the benefits of risk assessment, genetic counseling, genetic testing, and interventions are moderate. For women whose personal or family history or ancestry is not associated with an increased risk for harmful mutations in the BRCA1/2 genes, there is adequate evidence that the benefits of risk assessment, genetic counseling, genetic testing, and interventions are small to none. Regardless of family or personal history, the USPSTF found adequate evidence that the overall harms of risk assessment, genetic counseling, genetic testing, and interventions are small to moderate.Conclusions and recommendationThe USPSTF recommends that primary care clinicians assess women with a personal or family history of breast, ovarian, tubal, or peritoneal cancer or who have an ancestry associated with BRCA1/2 gene mutations with an appropriate brief familial risk assessment tool. Women with a positive result on the risk assessment tool should receive genetic counseling and, if indicated after counseling, genetic testing. (B recommendation) The USPSTF recommends against routine risk assessment, genetic counseling, or genetic testing for women whose personal or family history or ancestry is not associated with potentially harmful BRCA1/2 gene mutations. (D recommendation).
- Subjects :
- medicine.medical_specialty
Genetic counseling
Population
Genes, BRCA2
Genes, BRCA1
Breast Neoplasms
Genetic Counseling
Risk Assessment
Medical and Health Sciences
US Preventive Services Task Force
Breast cancer
General & Internal Medicine
Cancer screening
Medicine
Humans
Fallopian Tube Neoplasms
Genetic Predisposition to Disease
Genetic Testing
education
skin and connective tissue diseases
Peritoneal Neoplasms
Genetic testing
Ovarian Neoplasms
education.field_of_study
medicine.diagnostic_test
business.industry
Obstetrics
Cancer
General Medicine
medicine.disease
BRCA1
BRCA2
Genes
Mutation
Female
Skin cancer
business
Risk assessment
Subjects
Details
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- JAMA, vol 322, iss 7
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....c5c5e2f2bf4e278c205291f4f110dabe