Back to Search Start Over

Dosing accuracy of direct oral anticoagulants in an academic medical center

Authors :
Steve Merrill
Ashley Thompson
Janice B. Schwartz
Noelle de Leon
Margaret C. Fang
Source :
Journal of Hospital Medicine. 12:544-550
Publication Year :
2017
Publisher :
Wiley, 2017.

Abstract

Author(s): Schwartz, Janice; Merrill, Steve; de Leon, Noelle; Thompson, Ashley; Fang, Margaret | Abstract: Background/objectiveDirect-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are increasingly used to prevent or treat thromboembolism. We conducted a study to compare how well initial DOAC prescribing for adult inpatients adhered to dosing recommendations approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA).DesignRetrospective analysis.SettingSingle academic medical center, July 1, 2014 to June 30, 2015.Patients508 adult inpatients.MeasurementsDOAC prescriptions were evaluated to determine whether they met FDA-recommended dosing and administration according to patient age, weight, sex, race, kidney function, diagnoses, and concomitant medications.ResultsDOACs were prescribed in 635 admissions (247 apixaban, 97 dabigatran, 291 rivaroxaban). The indication was atrial fibrillation/flutter in 465 admissions (8% with bioprostheses or valve repair), chronic deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in 67, acute DVT in 32, chronic pulmonary embolism in 23, acute pulmonary embolism in 19, DVT prevention after hip or knee surgery in 19, and non-FDA-approved indications in 10. Sixteen percent of orders for venous thromboembolic disease were for patients with active malignancy. Dosages not concordant with recommendations were prescribed for apixaban in 18% of admissions, for rivaroxaban in 14%, and for dabigatran in 7% (? = 0.04). Lower than recommended dosing was more common than higher than recommended dosing (? l 0.05). Half the deviations were continuations of outpatient dosing. Atrial fibrillation/flutter and post-hip or -knee surgery dosing deviations were more common than venous thromboembolic disease deviations (? l 0.001) but were not related to prescriber specialty.ConclusionsDOAC prescribing recommendation deviations that can affect clinical efficacy were identified. Education and point-of-care decision support tools for improving dosing are needed, as are outcome data for patients who receive DOACs at lower than recommended dosing or for off-label indications.

Details

ISSN :
15535592
Volume :
12
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Hospital Medicine
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....c56dbb09fe5eaeccb0eb75093a2dfe61