Back to Search Start Over

The Love of Money and Pay Level Satisfaction: Measurement and Functional Equivalence in 29 Geopolitical Entities around the World

Authors :
Thompson S. H. Teo
Mahfooz A. Ansari
Johnsto E. Osagie
Peter Vlerick
Linzhi Du
Aahad M. Osman-Gani
Abdulgawi Salim Alzubaidi
Luigina Canova
Ilya Garber
Randy K. Chiu
Toto Sutarso
Horia D. Pitariu
Bor-Shiuan Cheng
Anthony Ugochukwu Obiajulu Nnedum
Ruja Pholsward
Anna Maria Manganelli
Rosario Correia Higgs
Caroline Urbain
Roberto Luna-Arocas
Chin Kang Jen
Vivien K. G. Lim
Fernando Arias-Galicia
Marco Tombolani
Alice S. Moreira
Allen F. Stembridge
Ali Mahdi Kazem
Thomas Li-Ping Tang
Éva Málovics
Michael W. Allen
Abdul Hamid Safwat Ibrahim
Theresa Li-Na Tang
Adebowale Akande
Consuelo García de la Torre
Brigitte Charles-Pauvers
Francisco José Costa Pereira
Elisaveta Sardzoska
Kilsun Kim
Marko Polič
Martina Trontelj
Mark G. Borg
Petar Skobic
Source :
BASE-Bielefeld Academic Search Engine
Publication Year :
2006
Publisher :
Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2006.

Abstract

Demonstrating the equivalence of constructs is a key requirement for cross-cultural empirical research. The major purpose of this paper is to demonstrate how to assess measurement and functional equivalence or invariance using the 9-item, 3-factor Love of Money Scale (LOMS, a second-order factor model) and the 4-item, 1-factor Pay Level Satisfaction Scale (PLSS, a first-order factor model) across 29 samples in six continents (N = 5973). In step 1, we tested the configural, metric and scalar invariance of the LOMS and 17 samples achieved measurement invariance. In step 2, we applied the same procedures to the PLSS and nine samples achieved measurement invariance. Five samples (Brazil, China, South Africa, Spain and the USA) passed the measurement invariance criteria for both measures. In step 3, we found that for these two measures, common method variance was non-significant. In step 4, we tested the functional equivalence between the Love of Money Scale and Pay Level Satisfaction Scale. We achieved functional equivalence for these two scales in all five samples. The results of this study suggest the critical importance of evaluating and establishing measurement equivalence in cross-cultural studies. Suggestions for remedying measurement non-equivalence are offered.

Details

ISSN :
17408784 and 17408776
Volume :
2
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Management and Organization Review
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....c4dd7c9d6fa4885dae8e9c4f3b247a3a