Back to Search Start Over

Comparison of Transradial vs Transfemoral Access for Aortoiliac and Femoropopliteal Interventions: A Single-Center Experience

Authors :
Hakim Benamer
Fadi J. Sawaya
Yann Roux
Oscar Tavolaro
Leticia Fernandez
Stéphane Champagne
Marco Spaziano
Raphaël Blanc
Andrew K. Roy
Thierry Unterseeh
Yves Louvard
Thierry Lefèvre
Michel Piotin
Thomas Hovasse
Bernard Chevalier
Phillipe Garot
Antoinette Neylon
Source :
Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists. 23(6)
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the procedure and safety outcomes of the transradial approach (TRA) with the femoral approach (FA) for treating aortoiliac and femoropopliteal stenoses and occlusions. Methods: A single-center retrospective study was conducted involving 188 patients (mean age 66.4±10.8 years; 116 men) with lower limb claudication or critical limb ischemia who underwent aortoiliac (131, 62.4%) or femoropopliteal (79, 37.6%) interventions on 210 lesions over a 3-year period. Operator discretion determined TRA suitability; exclusions included Raynaud’s disease, upper limb occlusive disease, previous TRA difficulties, or planned hemodialysis. Lesion characteristics, clinical endpoints, and access site complications were compared. Results: FA was used primarily in 123 patients and the TRA (12 left and 53 right radial arteries) in 65 procedures. Eleven (16.9%) TRAs failed vs 9 (7.3%) FAs (p=0.42). Crossover to FA was due to occlusive lesions requiring alternative equipment in 9 cases and to tortuosity of the aortic arch vessels in 2 patients. The 134 FA interventions (balloon angioplasty, stents) were retrograde (112, 83.6%) or antegrade (22, 16.4%). There were significantly more TASC C/D lesions in the FA group (p=0.02). Sheath sizes (5-F to 8-F) did not differ between groups, and no significant differences were found between FA vs TRA in terms of procedure time (50.0±28.9 vs 46.8±25.1 minutes, p=0.50) or length of stay (2.2±0.6 vs 2.1±0.3 days, p=0.24). While there were no strokes, access site complications occurred in 6.0% of the FA patients vs 3.7% of the TRA patients (p=0.12). Conclusion: The transradial approach for aortoiliac and femoropopliteal interventions is safe and efficacious compared with the transfemoral approach for a range of lesion subtypes. Nevertheless, there remains a need for improvements in peripheral device and catheter technology to decrease transradial failure rates.

Details

ISSN :
15451550
Volume :
23
Issue :
6
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....c27734b422170b7af7e4b6a9de557539