Kogesin vapustust või vapustuse? Sihilised verbid valikute ees

Toetudes eesti keele uhendkorpuse materjalidele, tutvustatakse artiklis regulaarset (lause aspektist soltuvat) ja ebaregulaarset (ka/voi muudest teguritest soltuvat) objekti vormivaheldust ja seda voimaldavaid, aspektverbidena kaituvaid verbe. Regulaarsena kasitletakse aspektverbide voi nende eritahendus(t)e) ning modifitseerivate elementide tottu aspektverbidena kaituvate partitiiv- ja perfektiivverbide aspekti eristavat kaandevaheldust. Ebaregulaarsuse juhtumitest on vaatluse all pusiuhendi struktuurist tingitud, verbi tahendusi eristav, neutraalset aspekti tahistav ja objektfraasi leksikaalsemantilisest koosseisust soltuv kaandevaheldus. *** Estonian transitive verbs facing choices Estonian transitive verbs are traditionally divided into partitive, aspect, and perfective verbs. While the classic definitions state that partitive verbs are to express imperfective aspect and to be applied with partitive objects only, and perfective verbs to appear with total objects in genitive or nominative cases, both verb types may allow differentional object case alternation (DOM) under certain circumstances. Object case alternation could be seen as regular (or distinguishing aspect) and non-regular (e.g., differentiating meanings of a verb, depending on context, object features, ‘neutral’ aspect, or the structure of a fixed expression). All these cases are analysed in the article based on the Estonian National Corpus 2017 materials.