Back to Search Start Over

Germline sequencing DNA repair genes in 5,545 men with aggressive and non-aggressive prostate cancer

Authors :
Rosalind A. Eeles
Christopher A. Haiman
David V. Conti
Xin Sheng
Zsofia Kote-Jarai
Peggy Wan
Burcu F. Darst
Kurt N. Hetrick
Demetrius Albanes
Roger L. Milne
Melissa C. Southey
Fredrik Wiklund
Lucy Xia
Lorelei A. Mucci
Loreall Pooler
Robert J. MacInnis
Graham G. Giles
Sonja I. Berndt
William J. Catalona
Vincent Gnanapragasam
Stephanie J. Weinstein
Stephen J. Chanock
Kimberly F. Doheny
Mark Pomerantz
Susan M. Gapstur
Julie A. Schmidt
Ed Saunders
Victoria L. Stevens
Tokhir Dadaev
Tu Nguyen-Dumont
Darst, Burcu F [0000-0002-6205-4632]
Chanock, Stephen [0000-0002-2324-3393]
Stevens, Victoria [0000-0003-0259-4407]
Albanes, Demetrius [0000-0001-8330-4293]
Weinstein, Stephanie J [0000-0002-3834-1535]
Pomerantz, Mark [0000-0003-4914-1157]
Schmidt, Julie A [0000-0002-7733-8750]
Southey, Melissa C [0000-0002-6313-9005]
Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository
Source :
J Natl Cancer Inst
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Oxford University Press, 2020.

Abstract

Background There is an urgent need to identify factors specifically associated with aggressive prostate cancer (PCa) risk. We investigated whether rare pathogenic, likely pathogenic, or deleterious (P/LP/D) germline variants in DNA repair genes are associated with aggressive PCa risk in a case-case study of aggressive vs nonaggressive disease. Methods Participants were 5545 European-ancestry men, including 2775 nonaggressive and 2770 aggressive PCa cases, which included 467 metastatic cases (16.9%). Samples were assembled from 12 international studies and germline sequenced together. Rare (minor allele frequency Results BRCA2 and PALB2 had the most statistically significant gene-based associations, with 2.5% of aggressive and 0.8% of nonaggressive cases carrying P/LP/D BRCA2 alleles (odds ratio [OR] = 3.19, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.94 to 5.25, P = 8.58 × 10-7) and 0.65% of aggressive and 0.11% of nonaggressive cases carrying P/LP/D PALB2 alleles (OR = 6.31, 95% CI = 1.83 to 21.68, P = 4.79 × 10-4). ATM had a nominal association, with 1.6% of aggressive and 0.8% of nonaggressive cases carrying P/LP/D ATM alleles (OR = 1.88, 95% CI = 1.10 to 3.22, P = .02). In aggregate, P/LP/D alleles within 24 literature-curated candidate PCa DNA repair genes were more common in aggressive than nonaggressive cases (carrier frequencies = 14.2% vs 10.6%, respectively; P = 5.56 × 10-5). However, this difference was non-statistically significant (P = .18) on excluding BRCA2, PALB2, and ATM. Among these 24 genes, P/LP/D carriers had a 1.06-year younger diagnosis age (95% CI = -1.65 to 0.48, P = 3.71 × 10-4). Conclusions Risk conveyed by DNA repair genes is largely driven by rare P/LP/D alleles within BRCA2, PALB2, and ATM. These findings support the importance of these genes in both screening and disease management considerations.

Details

Language :
English
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
J Natl Cancer Inst
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....c1e4984706ae09c2611da3bbd6428115