Back to Search
Start Over
General practitioner practice-based pharmacist input to medicines optimisation in the UK: pragmatic, multicenter, randomised, controlled trial
- Source :
- Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice, Vol 14, Iss 1, Pp 1-15 (2021), Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice, Syafhan, N F, Al Azzam, S, Williams, S D, Wilson, W, Brady, J, Lawrence, P, McCrudden, M, Ahmed, M, Scott, M G, Fleming, G, Hogg, A, Scullin, C, Horne, R, Ahir, H & McElnay, J C 2021, ' General practitioner practice-based pharmacist input to medicines optimisation in the UK: pragmatic, multicenter, randomised, controlled trial ', Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice, vol. 14, no. 1, 4 . https://doi.org/10.1186/s40545-020-00279-3
- Publication Year :
- 2021
- Publisher :
- BMC, 2021.
-
Abstract
- BackgroundChanging demographics across the UK has led to general practitioners (GPs) managing increasing numbers of older patients with multi-morbidity and resultant polypharmacy. Through government led initiatives within the National Health Service, an increasing number of GP practices employ pharmacist support. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of a medicines optimisation intervention, delivered by GP practice-based pharmacists, to patients at risk of medication-related problems (MRPs), on patient outcomes and healthcare costs.MethodsA multi-centre, randomised (normal care or pharmacist supplemented care) study in four regions of the UK, involving patients (n = 356) from eight GP practices, with a 6-month follow-up period. Participants were adult patients who were at risk of MRPs.ResultsMedian number of MRPs per intervention patient were reduced at the third assessment, i.e. 3 to 0.5 (p p = 0.001). Using the intention-to-treat (ITT) approach, the number of telephone consultations in intervention group patients was reduced and different from the control group (1 [0–3] to 1 [0–2] vs 1 [0–2] to 1 [0–3],p = 0.020). No significant differences between groups were, however, found in unplanned hospital admissions, length of hospital stay, number of A&E attendances or outpatient visits. The mean overall healthcare cost per intervention patient fell from £1041.7 ± 1446.7 to £859.1 ± 1235.2 (p = 0.032). Cost utility analysis showed an incremental cost per patient of − £229.0 (95% CI − 594.6, 128.2) and a mean QALY gained of 0.024 (95% CI − 0.021 to 0.065), i.e. indicative of a health status gain at a reduced cost (2016/2017).ConclusionThe pharmacist service was effective in reducing MRPs, inappropriateness of medications and telephone consultations in general practice in a cost-effective manner.Trial registration:ClinicalTrials.Gov, NCT03241498. Registered 7 August 2017—Retrospectively registered,https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03241498
- Subjects :
- medicine.medical_specialty
Pharmacist
lcsh:RS1-441
Pharmacy
law.invention
lcsh:Pharmacy and materia medica
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics(all)
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
Randomized controlled trial
law
Intervention (counseling)
Health care
medicine
030212 general & internal medicine
Healthcare resource utilisation
Medicines optimisation
Polypharmacy
Cost–utility analysis
business.industry
030503 health policy & services
Health Policy
Research
lcsh:RM1-950
Clinical pharmacy
Clinical pharmacist
lcsh:Therapeutics. Pharmacology
Emergency medicine
Practice-based pharmacist
0305 other medical science
business
General practice
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 20523211
- Volume :
- 14
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....c1c59bc0c68fda561117d723f7bb03a8