Back to Search Start Over

Radiation dose to neonates undergoing X-ray imaging in special care baby units in Iran

Authors :
Gholam Reza Kamyab
Fatemeh N. Alizadeh
Mandana Heirani
Mohsen Sharifzadeh
Hojjat Mahani
Meisam Moshkriz
Banafsheh Zeinali
Imen Namazi
Hossein Khorramdel
Sadaf Aghevlian
Reza Faghihi
S. Mehdizadeh
Sedigheh Sina
Source :
Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 150:55-59
Publication Year :
2011
Publisher :
Oxford University Press (OUP), 2011.

Abstract

Radiographic imaging has a significant role in the timely diagnosis of the diseases of neonates in intensive care units. The estimation of the dose received by the infants undergoing radiographic examination is of great importance, due to greater more radiosensitivity and longer life expectancy of the neonates and premature babies. In this study, the values of entrance skin dose (ESD), dose area products (DAPs), energy imparted (EI), whole-body dose, effective dose and risk of childhood cancer were estimated using three methods including direct method [using thermoluminescence dosimetry (TLD) chips], indirect method (using tube output) and Monte Carlo (MC) method (using MCNP4C code). In the first step, the ESD of the neonates was directly measured using TLD-100 chips. Fifty neonates, mostly premature, with different weights and gestational ages in five hospitals mostly suffering from respiratory distress syndrome and pneumonia were involved in this study. In the second step, the values of ESD to neonates were indirectly obtained from the tube output in different imaging techniques. The imaging room, incubator, neonates and other components were then simulated in order to obtain the ESD values using the MCNP4C code. Finally, the values of ESD assessed by the three methods were used for calculation of DAP, EI, whole-body dose, effective dose and risk of childhood cancer. The results indicate that the mean ESD per radiograph estimated by the direct, indirect and MC methods are 56.6±4.1, 50.1±3.1 and 54.5±3.3 μGy, respectively. The mean risk of childhood cancer estimated in this study varied between 4.21×10(-7) and 2.72×10(-6).

Details

ISSN :
17423406 and 01448420
Volume :
150
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Radiation Protection Dosimetry
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....c1aa885b6092ed4f0c35e75b8d440def