Back to Search Start Over

Clinical nutrition issues in 2022: What is missing to trust supplemental parenteral nutrition (SPN) in ICU patients?

Authors :
Mette M. Berger
Rosa Burgos
Michael P. Casaer
Edoardo De Robertis
Juan Carlos Lopez Delgado
Vincent Fraipont
João Gonçalves-Pereira
Claude Pichard
Christian Stoppe
Institut Català de la Salut
[Berger MM] Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland. [Burgos R] Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. [Casaer MP] Laboratory and Clinical Department of Intensive Care Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. [De Robertis E] Intensive Care Service, Department of Surgical and Biomedical Science, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy. [Lopez Delgado JC] Area de Vigilancia Intensiva (ICMiD), Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. [Fraipont V] Service of Intensive Care Medicine, Citadelle Hospital, Liège, Belgium
Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus
Source :
Scientia
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Clinical nutrition; Intensive care unit; Nutrition care Nutrició clínica; Unitat de cures intensives; Cura de la nutrició Nutrición Clínica; Unidad de cuidados intensivos; Cuidado de la nutrición A multidisciplinary group of international physicians involved in the medical nutrition therapy (MNT) of adult critically ill patients met to discuss the value, role, and open questions regarding supplemental parenteral nutrition (SPN) along with oral or enteral nutrition (EN), particularly in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting. This manuscript summarizes the discussions and results to highlight the importance of SPN as part of a comprehensive approach to MNT in critically ill adults and for researchers to generate new evidence based on well-powered randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The experts agreed on several key points: SPN has shown clinical benefits, resulting in this strategy being included in American and European guidelines. Nevertheless, its use is heterogeneous across European countries, due to the persistence of uncertainties, such as the optimal timing and the risk of overfeeding in absence of indirect calorimetry (IC), which results in divergent opinions and barriers to SPN implementation. Education is also insufficient. The experts agreed on actions needed to increase evidence quality on SPN use in specific patients at a given time point during acute critical illness or recovery. The organization of the Virtual Meeting that motivated this publication was funded by Baxter Healthcare SA. The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. MPC receives funding from the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO) (Grant No. 1832817N) and Onderzoeksraad, KU Leuven (Grant No. C24/17/070) and from the Private Charity Organization “Help Brandwonden Kids.

Details

ISSN :
1466609X
Volume :
26
Issue :
1
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Critical care (London, England)
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....c1607563aeab31106f307d745133a337