Back to Search
Start Over
Survival rates of short dental implants (≤6 mm) compared with implants longer than 6 mm in posterior jaw areas: A meta‐analysis
- Source :
- Clinical Oral Implants Research. 29:8-20
- Publication Year :
- 2018
- Publisher :
- Wiley, 2018.
-
Abstract
- Purpose To systematically review randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) reporting on the long-term survival and failure rates, as well as the complications of short implants (≤6 mm) versus longer implants (>6 mm) in posterior jaw areas. Materials and methods Electronic and manual searches were conducted to identify studies, specifically RCTs, reporting on short dental implants (≤6 mm) and their survival and complication rates compared with implants longer than 6 mm. Secondary outcomes analyzed were marginal bone loss and prosthesis survival rates. Results Ten RCTs fulfilled the inclusion criteria and featured a total of 637 short (≤6 mm) implants placed in 392 patients, while 653 standard implants (>6 mm) were inserted in 383 patients. The short implant survival rate ranged from 86.7% to 100%, whereas standard implant survival rate ranged from 95% to 100% with a follow-up from 1 to 5 years. The risk ratio (RR) for short implant failure compared to standard implants was 1.29 (95% CI: 0.67, 2.50, p = 0.45), demonstrating that overall, short implants presented higher risk of failure compared to longer implants. The heterogeneity test did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.67), suggesting low between-study heterogeneity. The prosthesis survival rates from the short implant groups ranged from 90% to 100% and from 95% to 100% for longer implant groups, respectively. Conclusion Short implants (≤6 mm) were found to have higher variability and lower predictability in survival rates compared to longer implants (>6 mm) after periods of 1-5 years in function. The mean survival rate was 96% (range: 86.7%-100%) for short implants, and 98% (range 95%-100%) for longer implants. Based on the quantity and quality of the evidence provided by 10 RCTs, short implants with ≤6 mm length should be carefully selected because they may present a greater risk for failure compared to implants longer than 6 mm.
- Subjects :
- Databases, Factual
Alveolar Bone Loss
Dentistry
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Statistical significance
Humans
Medicine
Dental Restoration Failure
030212 general & internal medicine
Survival rate
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Dental Implants
business.industry
Dental Implantation, Endosseous
Implant failure
030206 dentistry
Survival Analysis
Prosthesis Failure
Dental Prosthesis Design
Relative risk
Meta-analysis
Implant
Oral Surgery
Complication
business
Prosthesis Survival
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 16000501 and 09057161
- Volume :
- 29
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Clinical Oral Implants Research
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....c0945b9e3afa19dcf924088f244e137a
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13289