Back to Search Start Over

The IASLC Mesothelioma Staging Project: Proposals for the M Descriptors and for Revision of the TNM Stage Groupings in the Forthcoming (Eighth) Edition of the TNM Classification for Mesothelioma

Authors :
Valerie W. Rusch
Kari Chansky
Hedy L. Kindler
Anna K. Nowak
Harvey I. Pass
David C. Rice
Lynn Shemanski
Françoise Galateau-Sallé
Brian C. McCaughan
Takashi Nakano
Enrico Ruffini
Jan P. van Meerbeeck
Masahiro Yoshimura
Peter Goldstraw
Ramón Rami-Porta
Hisao Asamura
David Ball
David Beer
Ricardo Beyruti
Vanessa Bolejack
John Crowley
Frank C. Detterbeck
Wilfried Ernst Erich Eberhardt
John Edwards
Dorothy Giroux
Fergus Gleeson
Patti Groome
James Huang
Catherine Kennedy
Jhingook Kim
Young Tae Kim
Laura Kingsbury
Haruhiko Kondo
Mark Krasnik
Kaoru Kubota
Toni Lerut
Gustavo Lyons
Mirella Marino
Edith M. Marom
Alan Mitchell
Andrew G. Nicholson
Anna Nowak
Michael Peake
Thomas W. Rice
Kenneth Rosenzweig
Nagahiro Saijo
Paul Van Schil
Jean-Paul Sculier
Kelly Stratton
Kenji Suzuki
Yuji Tachimori
Charles F. Thomas
William D. Travis
Ming S. Tsao
Andrew Turrisi
Johan Vansteenkiste
Hirokazu Watanabe
Yi-Long Wu
Paul Baas
Jeremy Erasmus
Seiki Hasegawa
Kouki Inai
Kemp Kernstine
Hedy Kindler
Lee Krug
Kristiaan Nackaerts
Harvey Pass
David Rice
Conrad Falkson
Pier Luigi Filosso
Giuseppe Giaccone
Kazuya Kondo
Marco Lucchi
Meinoshin Okumura
Eugene Blackstone
H. Asamura
H. Batirel
A. Bille
U. Pastorino
S. Call
A. Cangir
S. Cedres
J. Friedberg
F. Galateau-Sallé
S. Hasagawa
K. Kernstine
H. Kindler
B. McCaughan
T. Nakano
A. Nowak
C. Atinkaya Ozturk
H. Pass
M. de Perrot
F. Rea
D. Rice
R. Rintoul
E. Ruffini
V. Rusch
L. Spaggiari
D. Galetta
K. Syrigos
C. Thomas
J.P. van Meerbeeck
P. Nafteux
J. Vansteenkiste
W. Weder
I. Optiz
M. Yoshimura
Nackaerts, Kristiaan
IASLC Staging Prognostic Factors
Source :
Journal of thoracic oncology
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

Introduction: The M component and TNM stage groupings for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) have been empirical. The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer developed a multinational database to propose evidence-based revisions for the eighth edition of the TNM classification of MPM. Methods: Data from 29 centers were submitted either electronically or by transfer of existing institutional databases. The M component as it currently stands was validated by confirming sufficient discrimination (by Kaplan-Meier analysis) with respect to overall survival (OS) between the clinical MO (cM0) and cM1 categories. Candidate stage groups were developed by using a recursive partitioning and amalgamation algorithm applied to all cM0 cases. Results: Of 3519 submitted cases, 2414 were analyzable and 84 were cM1 cases. Median OS for cM1 cases was 9.7 months versus 13.4 months (p = 0.0013) for the locally advanced (T4 or N3) cM0 cases, supporting inclusion of only cM1 in the stage IV group. Exploratory analyses suggest a possible difference in OS for single- versus multiple-site cM1 cases. A recursive partitioning and amalgamation generated survival tree on the OS outcomes restricted to cM0 cases with the newly proposed (eighth edition) T and N components indicates that optimal stage groupings for the eighth edition will be as follows: stage IA (T1N0), stage IB (T2-3N0), stage II (T1-2N1), stage IIIA (T3N1), stage IIIB (T1-3N2 or any T4), and stage IV (any M1). Conclusions: This first evidence-based revision of the TNM classification for MPM leads to substantial changes in the T and N components and the stage groupings. (C) 2016 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Details

ISSN :
15561380 and 15560864
Volume :
11
Issue :
12
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....c057f884d7099c4f7dcf87087e09210d