Back to Search Start Over

A Machine-Learning Framework to Identify Distinct Phenotypes of Aortic Stenosis Severity

Authors :
Partho P. Sengupta
Sirish Shrestha
Nobuyuki Kagiyama
Yasmin Hamirani
Hemant Kulkarni
Naveena Yanamala
Rong Bing
Calvin W.L. Chin
Tania A. Pawade
David Messika-Zeitoun
Lionel Tastet
Mylène Shen
David E. Newby
Marie-Annick Clavel
Phillippe Pibarot
Marc R. Dweck
Éric Larose
Ezequiel Guzzetti
Mathieu Bernier
Jonathan Beaudoin
Marie Arsenault
Nancy Côté
Russell Everett
William S.A. Jenkins
Christophe Tribouilloy
Julien Dreyfus
Tiffany Mathieu
Cedric Renard
Mesut Gun
Laurent Macron
Jacob W. Sechrist
Joan M. Lacomis
Virginia Nguyen
Laura Galian Gay
Hug Cuéllar Calabria
Ioannis Ntalas
Bernard Prendergast
Ronak Rajani
Arturo Evangelista
João L. Cavalcante
Source :
JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging. 14:1707-1720
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2021.

Abstract

Objectives The authors explored the development and validation of machine-learning models for augmenting the echocardiographic grading of aortic stenosis (AS) severity. Background In AS, symptoms and adverse events develop secondarily to valvular obstruction and left ventricular decompensation. The current echocardiographic grading of AS severity focuses on the valve and is limited by diagnostic uncertainty. Methods Using echocardiography (ECHO) measurements (ECHO cohort, n = 1,052), we performed patient similarity analysis to derive high-severity and low-severity phenogroups of AS. We subsequently developed a supervised machine-learning classifier and validated its performance with independent markers of disease severity obtained using computed tomography (CT) (CT cohort, n = 752) and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging (CMR cohort, n = 160). The classifier’s prognostic value was further validated using clinical outcomes (aortic valve replacement [AVR] and death) observed in the ECHO and CMR cohorts. Results In 1,964 patients from the 3 multi-institutional cohorts, 1,346 (68%) subjects had either nonsevere or discordant AS severity. Machine learning identified 1,117 (57%) patients as having high-severity and 847 (43%) as having low-severity AS. High-severity patients in CT and CMR cohorts had higher valve calcium scores and left ventricular mass and fibrosis, respectively than the low-severity group. In the ECHO cohort, progression to AVR and progression to death in patients who did not receive AVR was faster in the high-severity group. Compared with the conventional classification of disease severity, machine-learning–based severity classification improved discrimination (integrated discrimination improvement: 0.07; 95% confidence interval: 0.02 to 0.12) and reclassification (net reclassification improvement: 0.17; 95% confidence interval: 0.11 to 0.23) for the outcome of AVR at 5 years. For both ECHO and CMR cohorts, we observed prognostic value of the machine-learning classifications for subgroups with asymptomatic, nonsevere or discordant AS. Conclusions Machine learning can integrate ECHO measurements to augment the classification of disease severity in most patients with AS, with major potential to optimize the timing of AVR.

Details

ISSN :
1936878X
Volume :
14
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....c04f2b9028f1de8b148b215605359f16