Back to Search Start Over

A decade of living lobar lung transplantation: recipient outcomes

Authors :
Mark L. Barr
Marlyn S. Woo
Craig J. Baker
Felicia A. Schenkel
Ross M. Bremner
Robbin G. Cohen
Monica V. Horn
Eric M. Sievers
Vaughn A. Starnes
Winfield J. Wells
Renzo Pessotto
Richard G. Barbers
Michael E. Bowdish
Source :
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. (1):114-122
Publisher :
The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc.

Abstract

Objective Living lobar lung transplantation was developed as a procedure for patients considered too ill to await cadaveric transplantation. Methods One hundred twenty-eight living lobar lung transplantations were performed in 123 patients between 1993 and 2003. Eighty-four patients were adults (age, 27 ± 7.7 years), and 39 were pediatric patients (age, 13.9 ± 2.9 years). Results The primary indication for transplantation was cystic fibrosis (84%). At the time of transplantation, 67.5% of patients were hospitalized, and 17.9% were intubated. One-, 3-, and 5-year actuarial survival among living lobar recipients was 70%, 54%, and 45%, respectively. There was no difference in actuarial survival between adult and pediatric living lobar recipients ( P = .65). There were 63 deaths among living lobar recipients, with infection being the predominant cause (53.4%), followed by obliterative bronchiolitis (12.7%) and primary graft dysfunction (7.9%). The overall incidence of acute rejection was 0.8 episodes per patient. Seventy-eight percent of rejection episodes were unilateral. Age, sex, indication, donor relationship, preoperative hospitalization status, use of preoperative steroids, and HLA-A, HLA-B, and HLA-DR typing did not influence survival. However, patients on ventilators preoperatively had significantly worse outcomes (odds ratio, 3.06, P = .03; Kaplan-Meier P = .002), and those undergoing retransplantation had an increased risk of death (odds ratio, 2.50). Conclusion These results support the continued use of living lobar lung transplantation in patients deemed unable to await a cadaveric transplantation. We consider patients undergoing retransplantations and intubated patients to be at significantly high risk because of the poor outcomes in these populations.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00225223
Issue :
1
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....c043f9a69f342bfa4c8072790d773fdb
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2003.07.042