Back to Search Start Over

Oral Versus Standard Antimicrobial Treatment for Pyogenic Native Vertebral Osteomyelitis: A Single-Center, Retrospective, Propensity Score-Balanced Analysis

Authors :
Lorenzo Marconi
Sara Tedeschi
Eleonora Zamparini
Silvia Terzi
Nicolò Rossi
Luca Boriani
Filippo Trapani
Maddalena Giannella
Damiano Alfio Ruinato
Elisa Marchionni
Alessandro Gasbarrini
Pierluigi Viale
Marconi L.
Tedeschi S.
Zamparini E.
Terzi S.
Rossi N.
Boriani L.
Trapani F.
Giannella M.
Ruinato D.A.
Marchionni E.
Gasbarrini A.
Viale P.
Source :
Open Forum Infectious Diseases. 9
Publication Year :
2022
Publisher :
Oxford University Press (OUP), 2022.

Abstract

Background Interest in shorter antimicrobial regimens and oral treatment for osteoarticular infections is growing. The aim of this study is to assess whether there is an association between the administration of an entirely oral antibiotic therapy (OT) and the clinical outcome of native vertebral osteomyelitis (NVOs). Methods We conducted a single-center, retrospective, observational study on consecutive patients with pyogenic NVOs over a 10-year period (2008–2018). We performed multivariate logistic regression analysis to identify risk factors for clinical failure, both in the whole population and in subgroups. The impact of OT versus standard treatment (intravenous induction followed by oral treatment whenever possible) was assessed in patients with a non-multidrug-resistant microorganism (MDRO) etiology, and the impact of a rifampin-containing regimen was assessed in patients affected by NVOs caused by staphylococci or of unknown etiology. Results The study population included 249 patients, and 33 (13.3%) experienced clinical failure; the OT group consisted of 54 patients (21.7%). Multivariate regression analysis of the whole population selected Charlson comorbidity index (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.291; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.114–1.497; P = .001) and MDRO etiology (aOR, 3.301; 95% CI, 1.368–7.964; P = .008) as independent factors for clinical failure. Among patients affected by a non-MDRO NVO, OT was not associated with an increased risk of clinical failure (aOR, 0.487; 95% CI, .133–1.782; P = .271), even after adjustment for the propensity score of receiving OT. In the subgroup of patients with staphylococcal or unknown etiology, NVO rifampin was independently associated with favorable outcome (aOR, 0.315; 95% CI, .105–.949; P = .040). Conclusions An entirely oral, highly bioavailable treatment, including rifampin, may be as effective as parenteral treatment in selected patients with NVOs.

Details

ISSN :
23288957
Volume :
9
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....bfc334f8c528afd2da77ed717b56c668
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac366