Back to Search Start Over

Two-Year Outcomes of Surgical Treatment of Severe Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation

Authors :
Eric A. Rose
Peter K. Smith
Michael Argenziano
Annetine C. Gelijns
Helena L. Chang
Sandra G. Burks
Louis P. Perrault
François Dagenais
Gorav Ailawadi
Marissa A. Miller
Judy Hung
Ellen Moquete
Patrick T. O'Gara
Robert E. Michler
Vinod H. Thourani
Ismail El-Hamamsy
Neal Jeffries
Lopa N. Gupta
Richard D. Weisel
Carmelo A. Milano
Jessica Overbey
Pierre Voisine
A. Marc Gillinov
John D. Puskas
Wendy C. Taddei-Peters
Joseph J. DeRose
Michael K. Parides
Michael A. Acker
Emilia Bagiella
Pavan Atluri
James S. Gammie
Alan J. Moskowitz
Source :
New England Journal of Medicine. 374:344-353
Publication Year :
2016
Publisher :
Massachusetts Medical Society, 2016.

Abstract

In a randomized trial comparing mitral-valve repair with mitral-valve replacement in patients with severe ischemic mitral regurgitation, we found no significant difference in the left ventricular end-systolic volume index (LVESVI), survival, or adverse events at 1 year after surgery. However, patients in the repair group had significantly more recurrences of moderate or severe mitral regurgitation. We now report the 2-year outcomes of this trial.We randomly assigned 251 patients to mitral-valve repair or replacement. Patients were followed for 2 years, and clinical and echocardiographic outcomes were assessed.Among surviving patients, the mean (±SD) 2-year LVESVI was 52.6±27.7 ml per square meter of body-surface area with mitral-valve repair and 60.6±39.0 ml per square meter with mitral-valve replacement (mean changes from baseline, -9.0 ml per square meter and -6.5 ml per square meter, respectively). Two-year mortality was 19.0% in the repair group and 23.2% in the replacement group (hazard ratio in the repair group, 0.79; 95% confidence interval, 0.46 to 1.35; P=0.39). The rank-based assessment of LVESVI at 2 years (incorporating deaths) showed no significant between-group difference (z score=-1.32, P=0.19). The rate of recurrence of moderate or severe mitral regurgitation over 2 years was higher in the repair group than in the replacement group (58.8% vs. 3.8%, P0.001). There were no significant between-group differences in rates of serious adverse events and overall readmissions, but patients in the repair group had more serious adverse events related to heart failure (P=0.05) and cardiovascular readmissions (P=0.01). On the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire, there was a trend toward greater improvement in the replacement group (P=0.07).In patients undergoing mitral-valve repair or replacement for severe ischemic mitral regurgitation, we observed no significant between-group difference in left ventricular reverse remodeling or survival at 2 years. Mitral regurgitation recurred more frequently in the repair group, resulting in more heart-failure-related adverse events and cardiovascular admissions. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health and Canadian Institutes of Health Research; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00807040.).

Details

ISSN :
15334406 and 00284793
Volume :
374
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
New England Journal of Medicine
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....bfbe62159db3c72a755e020833d707f6
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1512913