Apiomerus immundus Bergroth 1898

Apiomerus immundus Bergroth, 1898 Figs 1A, 2A, 2G, 3A, 3E Apiomerus immundus Bergroth, 1898: 307. Syntype (s): Mexico; MZH. Apiomerus immundus: Champion (1899: 238) (revision), Van Duzee (1916: 30) (catalog), Wygodzinsky (1949: 17) (catalog), Costa Lima et al. (1951: 340) (revision), Maldonado (1990: 5) (catalog). Revised diagnosis: Recognized by the combination of the following characteristics: (1) relatively small size (26 endosomal denticles. Redescription (based on the lectotype only): Male: Small, 11.45 mm in length, width across humeral angles 3.47 mm. COLORATION: Mostly brown; anterior pronotal lobe dark brown, posterior lobe brown (Fig. 1A); corium brown, veins near forewing membrane largely lacking light coloration, quadrate cell of the corium is not outlined in white or pale-yellow; entire forewing membrane brown with dark spots; basal spot of connexivum 7 roughly twice the size of marking on the preceding segment (from dorsal view); lateral spots of abdominal sterna absent. STRUCTURE: Medial process of pygophore lyre-shaped in caudal view, rami short and nearly straight (Fig. 2A); paramere weakly bent, with bristles subequal to or slightly longer than its maximal width (Fig. 2G); dorsal phallothecal sclerite lacking distinct arrow-shaped in dorsal view, without pair of strongly developed triangular projections near base, apex of dorsal phallothecal sclerite truncate and reflexed (Fig. 3A); basal dorsolateral sclerites of endosoma of moderate length, oblong, and covered with fine granules basally; dorsal surface of endosoma with>26 denticles arranged longitudinally; dorsolateral surface of endosoma with distinct sclerotization near base. Female: Unknown. Biology: Unknown. Distribution: The geographical range of this species remains unknown. The type specimen was collected in Mexico, but no additional locality data was provided. Discussion: This species is included in this revision based on its general appearance and the many male genitalic similarities it shares with species of the maya group, such as the lyre-shaped medial process of pygophore, enlarged basal dorsolateral sclerites of the endosoma, and high number of endosomal denticles. This species however lacks the distinct arrow-shaped dorsal phallothecal sclerite that other maya group species possess (Fig. 3A) and has heavier lateral sclerotization along the dorsolateral surface of endosoma basally (Figs 3A, 3E). Szerlip (1980) included A. immundus among his A. subpiceus species group, a likely artificial grouping that he referred to as “a catchall for species from Central Mexico, the Yucatan Peninsula and Cuba ” but did not examine Bergroth’s type specimen. Overall, A. immundus appears most similar to A. maya but lacks the paired triangular projections at the base of the dorsal phallothecal sclerite, has slightly longer, more oblong dorsolateral sclerites of the endosoma with finer sculpturing, and appears to possess more endosomal denticles (>26). Type information: The species was described based on an unspecified number of male individuals (Bergroth 1898). A single type of Bergroth from MZH, subsequently provided with a curatorial syntype label, has been examined (Fig. 1B). As the original description does not exclude the possibility that the species was described based on more than one individual, following Recommendation 73F of ICZN (1999), the examined specimen is regarded as a syntype, and here designated as lectotype of A. immundus. Type material examined: Lectotype (present designation): ♂, MEXICO: exact locality and date unknown (UCR _ ENT 00040816) (MZH) (Fig. 1A).
Published as part of Masonick, Paul & Weirauch, Christiane, 2022, Taxonomic revision of the Apiomerus maya species group (Heteroptera: Reduviidae: Harpactorinae), pp. 537-556 in Zootaxa 5154 (5) on page 541, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5154.5.3, http://zenodo.org/record/6655680
{"references":["Bergroth, E. (1898) Description de deux Reduviides noveaux (Hemipt.). Bulletin de la Societe Entomologique de France, 67, 307 - 308. https: // doi. org / 10.3406 / bsef. 1898.22241","Champion, G. C. (1899) Insecta. Rhynchota. Hemiptera-Heteroptera. Vol. II. Part CXLVII. In: Godman, F. D. & Salvin, O. (Eds.), Biologia Centrali-Americana. Zoologia. R. H. Porter, London, pp. 217 - 240, pl. 13.","Van Duzee, E. P. (1916) Check list of the Hemiptera (excepting Aphididae, Aleurodidae and Coccidae) of America north of Mexico. New York Entomological Society, New York, 111 pp. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 7967","Wygodzinsky, P. (1949) Elenco sistematico de los Reduviiformes americanos. Instituto de Medicina Regional de la Universidad Nacional de Tucuman, Monografia, 1, 1 - 102.","Costa Lima, A., Seabra, C. A. & Hathaway, C. R. (1951) Estudo dos Apiomeros (Hemiptera: Reduviidae). Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, 49, 273 - 442. https: // doi. org / 10.1590 / S 0074 - 02761951000100004","Maldonado Capriles, J. (1990) Systematic catalogue of the Reduviidae of the World. (Caribbean Journal of Science, Special publication No. 1.) University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez, Puerto Rico, 694 pp.","Szerlip, S. L. (1980) Biosystematic revision of the genus Apiomerus (Hemiptera: Reduviidae) in North and Central America. Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, California, 481 pp.","ICZN (International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature) (1999) International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. Fourth edition. International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature, London, xxix + 306 pp."]}