Back to Search Start Over

Differences in nomenclature usage and preference among dermatopathologists for 'dysplastic' nevi: A national survey

Authors :
Austin R. Green
Ata Moshiri
Daniel S. Hippe
Caroline Raymundo
Michael Piepkorn
Michi M. Shinohara
Source :
Journal of Cutaneous Pathology. 50:530-535
Publication Year :
2023
Publisher :
Wiley, 2023.

Abstract

Ongoing controversy exists regarding terminology used to describe atypical melanocytic nevi. Efforts to standardize nomenclature, including the 1992 NIH consensus conference, have been largely unsuccessful. Significant advances have revealed an increasingly detailed genetic picture of melanocytic neoplasms, including strong evidence for the existence of those with "intermediate" behavior.We sent an electronic survey to dermatopathologists (n=846) to assess trends in nomenclature usage and attitudes toward developing new consensus nomenclature for atypical melanocytic nevi.There were 229 complete responses (27.1% response rate). The most used/preferred nomenclature was "dysplastic nevus" (43%/39%, respectively), followed by the NIH-recommended terminology (28%/26%). Three-tier grading systems were most heavily used/preferred (79%/63%). Dermatopathologists based in New England were most likely to use the NIH terminology, whereas "dysplastic nevus" or 'other' were most used elsewhere (p=0.029). Most (76%) expressed at least "moderate" enthusiasm for developing consensus nomenclature, with 47% "very" or "extremely" enthusiastic.Little has changed with the wide variation in terminology for atypical melanocytic nevi. There continues to be no one dominant terminology in use. However, there is enthusiasm for standardization. A new attempt at updated consensus nomenclature may be fruitful.

Details

ISSN :
16000560 and 03036987
Volume :
50
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Cutaneous Pathology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....bf7d78015a96a92b03dd191412598b14
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/cup.14341