Back to Search Start Over

Clinical and radiological findings in Brazilian patients with mucolipidosis types II/III

Authors :
Rachel Sayuri Honjo
José Ricardo Magliocco Ceroni
Chong Ae Kim
Diana Salazar Bermeo
Gustavo Marquezani Spolador
Débora Romeo Bertola
Luiz Antonio Nunes de Oliveira
Source :
Skeletal Radiology. 48:1201-1207
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2019.

Abstract

The present study aims to provide orientation for clinicians and radiologists to recognize the most prevalent findings leading to diagnosis in mucolipidosis from a description of the natural history of five Brazilian cases. We conducted an observational and retrospective study of five patients with clinical and radiological diagnosis of mucolipidosis. Clinical evaluation consisted of information obtained from records and including physical, neurologic, and dysmorphic evaluations. Radiologic studies consisted of complete skeletal radiographs of all patients. Enzyme assessment was performed for confirmation of the diagnosis. The five patients were referred for genetic evaluation due to disproportionate short stature with short trunk accompanied by waddling gait. Age at referral varied from 11 months to 28 years. The most prevalent findings were joint restriction (4/5 patients), neuropsychomotor developmental delay (3/5), coarse facies (2/5), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (2/5), and mental retardation (1/4 patients). The most common radiological findings were anterior beaking of the vertebral bodies (5/5), shallow acetabular fossae (5/5), epiphyseal dysplasia (5/5), platyspondyly (4/5), pelvic dysplasia (4/5), decreased bone mineralization (4/5), scoliosis (3/5), wide and oar-shaped ribs (3/5), generalized epiphyseal ossification delay (3/5), and hypoplasia of basilar portions of ilea (3/5). Enzyme assessment showed α-iduronidase, α-mannosidase, β-glucuronidase, hexosaminidase A, and total hexosaminidase increased in plasma and normal glycosaminoglycans concentration. One patient was clinically classified as ML II and four patients as ML III. The follow-up of five patients showed the typical clinical and radiological findings allowing the diagnosis, thus improving clinical management and providing adequate genetic counseling. Clinicians and radiologists can take advantage of the information from this work, enhancing their differential diagnosis ability.

Details

ISSN :
14322161 and 03642348
Volume :
48
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Skeletal Radiology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....bf3834750bd4da956c4e00bcc3093c86
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-019-3159-x