Back to Search
Start Over
Water pollution by Cu and Pb can adversely affect mallard embryonic development
- Source :
- Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 65:67-73
- Publication Year :
- 2006
- Publisher :
- Elsevier BV, 2006.
-
Abstract
- The effects of heavy metal pollutants on aquatic birds have been widely studied in ecotoxicological investigations; however, the predominant focus has been on the postnatal period of life. Limited information on the adverse effects of metals to bird eggs is available. The possible toxic effects of lead and copper were studied in mallard eggs. After the accidental severe heavy metal pollution of the Tisa river (Hungary) in March 2000, these metals were detected in the highest concentration in both the water and the sediment, reaching far beyond acceptable concentrations. Pb treatment (2.9 mg/L) significantly increased the rate of mortality after a single immersion of the eggs into polluted water for 30 min. The rate of dead embryos significantly increased after the combined exposure to Cu and Pb (0.86 and 2.9 mg/L, respectively) both in the single- (once for 30 min) and in the multiple- (10s daily during first trimester of incubation) immersion groups. It was concluded that elevated metal concentrations similar to those found in the Tisa river after the tailing dam failure may cause toxic effects (mortality and teratogenicity) upon exposure of mallard eggs.
- Subjects :
- Pollution
Embryo, Nonmammalian
Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
media_common.quotation_subject
Embryonic Development
Biology
Bird egg
Birds
Egg Shell
Animal science
Egg White
Animals
Ecotoxicology
Eggshell
Water pollution
Incubation
media_common
Pollutant
Ecology
Water Pollution
Embryogenesis
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
General Medicine
Egg Yolk
Lead
Copper
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 01476513
- Volume :
- 65
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....bf1125053b98bbc50570cc9067ae1584
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2005.05.016