Back to Search Start Over

Roughness of a subglacial conduit under Hansbreen, Svalbard

Authors :
Piotr S. Głowacki
Kenneth D. Mankoff
Slawek Tulaczyk
Xiaofeng Liu
Matthew D. Covington
Jason Gulley
Douglas I. Benn
Yunxiang Chen
University of St Andrews. School of Geography and Geosciences
University of St Andrews. Geography & Sustainable Development
University of St Andrews. Bell-Edwards Geographic Data Institute
Source :
Journal of Glaciology. 63:423-435
Publication Year :
2017
Publisher :
Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2017.

Abstract

K.M., J.G., X.L. and Y.C. were supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under Grant No. #1503928. Thefieldwork team (K.M., J.G., M.C.) were supported by the Norwegian Arctic Research Council and Svalbard Science Forum, RiS #6106. K.M. was also supported by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)Headquarters under the NASA Earth and Space Science Fellowship Program – Grant NNX10AN83H, the University of California, Santa Cruz, and the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Ocean and Climate Change Institute post-graduate fellowship. Portions of this work were conducted while J.G. was supported by the NSF EAR Postdoctoral Fellowship (#0946767). S.T. was funded by NASA grant NNX11AH61G. Hydraulic roughness exerts an important but poorly understood control on water pressure in subglacial conduits. Where relative roughness values are 5%. Here we report the first quantitative assessment of roughness heights and hydraulic diameters in a subglacial conduit. We measured roughness heights in a 125 m long section of a subglacial conduit using structure-from-motion to produce a digital surface model, and hand-measurements of the b-axis of rocks. We found roughness heights from 0.07 to 0.22 m and cross-sectional areas of 1-2 m2, resulting in relative roughness of 3-12% and >5% for most locations. A simple geometric model of varying conduit diameter shows that when the conduit is small relative roughness is >30% and has large variability. Our results suggest that parameterizations of conduit hydraulic roughness in subglacial hydrological models will remain challenging until hydraulic diameters exceed roughness heights by a factor of 20, or the conduit radius is >1 m for the roughness elements observed here. Publisher PDF

Details

ISSN :
17275652 and 00221430
Volume :
63
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Glaciology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....befe0c7812a27101556f060913738df8
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2016.134