Back to Search
Start Over
Comparison of automated irrigation systems using an in vitro ureteroscopy model
- Source :
- International braz j urol v.46 n.3 2020, International Braz J Urol, Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU), instacron:SBU, International Brazilian Journal of Urology, Vol 46, Iss 3, Pp 390-397 (2020), International braz j urol, Volume: 46, Issue: 3, Pages: 390-397, Published: 30 MAR 2020, International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology, vol 46, iss 3
- Publication Year :
- 2020
- Publisher :
- Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia, 2020.
-
Abstract
- Author(s): Fedrigon, Donald; Alshara, Luay; Monga, Manoj | Abstract: INTRODUCTION:Two automated irrigation systems have been released for use during endoscopic procedures such as ureteroscopy: the Cogentix RocaFlow® (CRF) and Thermedx FluidSmart® (TFS). Accurate pressure control using automated systems may help providers maintain irrigation pressures within a safe range while also providing clear visualization. Our objective was to directly compare these systems based on their pressure accuracy, pressure-flow relationships, and fluid heating capabilities in order to help providers better utilize the temperature and pressure settings of each system. MATERIALS AND METHODS:An in vitro ureteroscopy model was used for testing, consisting of a short semirigid ureteroscope (6/7, 5F, 31cm Wolf 425612) connected to a continuous digital pressure transducer (Meriam m1550). Each system pressure output and flow-rate, via 100mL beaker filling time, was measured using multiple trials at pressure settings between 30 and 300mmHg. Output fluid temperature was monitored using a digital thermometer (Omega DP25-TH). RESULTS:The pressure output of both systems exceeded the desired setting across the entire tested range, a difference of 15.7±2.4mmHg for the TFS compared to 5.2±1.5mmHg for the CRF (p l 0.0001). Related to this finding, the TFS also had slightly higher flow rates across all trials (7±2mL/min). Temperature testing revealed a similar maximum temperature of 34.0⁰C with both systems, however, the TFS peaked after only 8 minutes and started to plateau as early as 4-5 minutes into the test, while the CRF took over 18 minutes to reach a similar peak. CONCLUSIONS:Our in vitro ureteroscopy testing found that the CRF system had better pressure accuracy than the TFS system but with noticeably slower fluid heating capabilities. Each system provided steady irrigation at safe pressures within their expected operating parameters with small differences in performance that should not limit their ability to provide steady irrigation at safe pressures.
- Subjects :
- Irrigation
Technology
Urology
030232 urology & nephrology
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Pressure
Range (statistics)
Ureteroscopy
Medicine
Therapeutic Irrigation
Simulation
Maximum temperature
medicine.diagnostic_test
business.industry
Pressure control
Research
Temperature
Urology & Nephrology
Pressure sensor
Diseases of the genitourinary system. Urology
Temperature and pressure
030220 oncology & carcinogenesis
Thermometer
Ureteroscopes
RC870-923
business
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- International braz j urol v.46 n.3 2020, International Braz J Urol, Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU), instacron:SBU, International Brazilian Journal of Urology, Vol 46, Iss 3, Pp 390-397 (2020), International braz j urol, Volume: 46, Issue: 3, Pages: 390-397, Published: 30 MAR 2020, International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology, vol 46, iss 3
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....bd6161dffe7a7332aa74aa210b8ff7f0