Back to Search Start Over

Correlations between leaf toughness and phenolics among species in contrasting environments of Australia and New Caledonia

Authors :
Paula J. Peeters
Jennifer Read
Elizabeth Caldwell
Byron B. Lamont
Fiona J. Clissold
Tanguy Jaffré
Stuart Kerr
Michel De Garine-Wichatitsky
Alexanda Sarah-Jane Chatain
Gordon Drummond Sanson
School of Biological Sciences [Clayton]
Monash University [Clayton]
Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care
VU University Medical Center [Amsterdam]
Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (Cirad)
Botanique et Modélisation de l'Architecture des Plantes et des Végétations (UMR AMAP)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Montpellier (UM)-Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (Cirad)-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD [France-Sud])
Laboratoire de botanique et d'écologie appliquées
School of Biological Sciences
Monash University [Melbourne]
Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (Cirad)-Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-Université de Montpellier (UM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD [France-Sud])
Source :
Annals of Botany, Annals of Botany, Oxford University Press (OUP), 2009, 103 (5), pp.757-67. ⟨10.1093/aob/mcn246⟩
Publication Year :
2009
Publisher :
HAL CCSD, 2009.

Abstract

†Background and Aims Plants are likely to invest in multiple defences, given the variety of sources of biotic andabiotic damage to which they are exposed. However, little is known about syndromes of defence across plantspecies and how these differ in contrasting environments. Here an investigation is made into the associationbetween carbon-based chemical and mechanical defences, predicting that species that invest heavily in mechan-ical defence of leaves will invest less in chemical defence.†Methods A combination of published and unpublished data is used to test whether species with tougher leaveshave lower concentrations of phenolics, using 125 species from four regions of Australia and the Pacific island ofNew Caledonia, in evergreen vegetation ranging from temperate shrubland and woodland to tropical shrublandand rainforest. Foliar toughness was measured as work-to-shear and specific work-to-shear (work-to-shear perunit leaf thickness). Phenolics were measured as ‘total phenolics’ and by protein precipitation (an estimate oftannin activity) per leaf dry mass.†Key Results Contrary to prediction, phenolic concentrations were not negatively correlated with either measureof leaf toughness when examined across all species, within regions or within any plant community. Instead,measures of toughness (particularly work-to-shear) and phenolics were often positively correlated in shrublandand rainforest (but not dry forest) in New Caledonia, with a similar trend suggested for shrubland in south-western Australia. The common feature of these sites was low concentrations of soil nutrients, with evidenceof P limitation.†Conclusions Positive correlations between toughness and phenolics in vegetation on infertile soils suggest thatadditive investment in carbon-based mechanical and chemical defences is advantageous and cost-effective inthese nutrient-deficient environments where carbohydrate may be in surplus.Key words: Antiherbivore defence, leaf toughness, mechanical defence, chemical defence, phenolics, trade-offs.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
03057364 and 10958290
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Annals of Botany, Annals of Botany, Oxford University Press (OUP), 2009, 103 (5), pp.757-67. ⟨10.1093/aob/mcn246⟩
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....bcae5a9acfbc1794469bd7442eb0c4f7