Back to Search Start Over

EHRA Expert Consensus Statement on the management of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices in patients nearing end of life or requesting withdrawal of therapy

Authors :
Luigi, Padeletti
David O, Arnar
Lorenzo, Boncinelli
Johannes, Brachman
John A, Camm
Jean Claude, Daubert
Sarah K, Hassam
Sarah, Kassam
Luc, Deliens
Michael, Glikson
David, Hayes
Carsten, Israel
Rachel, Lampert
Trudie, Lobban
Pekka, Raatikainen
Gil, Siegal
Panos, Vardas
Paulus, Kirchhof
RĂ¼diger, Becker
Francisco, Cosio
Peter, Loh
Stuart, Cobbe
Andrew, Grace
John, Morgan
Public and occupational health
EMGO - Quality of care
Source :
Europace, 12(10), 1480-1489. Oxford University Press, Padeletti, L, Arnar, D O, Boncinelli, L, Brachman, J, Camm, J A, Daubert, J C, Kassam, S, Deliens, L, Glikson, M, Hayes, D, Israel, C, Lampert, R, Lobban, T, Raatikainen, P, Siegal, G, Vardas, P, Kirchhof, P, Becker, R, Cosio, F, Loh, P, Cobbe, S, Grace, A & Morgan, J 2010, ' EHRA Expert consensus statement on the management of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices in patients nearing end of life or requesting withdrawal of therapy ', Europace, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 1480-1489 . https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euq275
Publication Year :
2010

Abstract

The purpose of this Consensus Statement is to focus on implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) deactivation in patients with irreversible or terminal illness. This statement summarizes the opinions of the Task Force members, convened by the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) and the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), based on ethical and legal principles, as well as their own clinical, scientific, and technical experience. It is directed to all healthcare professionals who treat patients with implanted ICDs, nearing end of life, in order to improve the patient dying process. This statement is not intended to recommend or promote device deactivation. Rather, the ultimate judgement regarding this procedure must be made by the patient (or in special conditions by his/her legal representative) after careful communication about the deactivation's consequences, respecting his/her autonomy and clarifying that he/she has a legal and ethical right to refuse it. Obviously, the physician asked to deactivate the ICD and the industry representative asked to assist can conscientiously object to and refuse to perform device deactivation.

Details

ISSN :
15322092 and 10995129
Volume :
12
Issue :
10
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....b99c25640f7a76624da043ade41f934f