Back to Search Start Over

CAUSES : on the role of surface energy budget errors to the warm surface air temperature error over the Central United States

Authors :
Y. Liu
Maike Ahlgrimm
Richard G. Forbes
Qi Tang
William I. Gustafson
Hsi-Yen Ma
Jason N. S. Cole
Yun Qian
K. Van Weverberg
Cyril J. Morcrette
Chengzhu Zhang
Larry K. Berg
Frédérique Cheruy
Shuaiqi Tang
Romain Roehrig
Maoyi Huang
Shaocheng Xie
William J. Merryfield
S. A. Klein
Jon Petch
Yi-Chi Wang
Source :
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Many weather forecast and climate models simulate warm surface air temperature (T-2m) biases over midlatitude continents during the summertime, especially over the Great Plains. We present here one of a series of papers from a multimodel intercomparison project (CAUSES: Cloud Above the United States and Errors at the Surface), which aims to evaluate the role of cloud, radiation, and precipitation biases in contributing to the T-2m bias using a short-term hindcast approach during the spring and summer of 2011. Observations are mainly from the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Southern Great Plains sites. The present study examines the contributions of surface energy budget errors. All participating models simulate too much net shortwave and longwave fluxes at the surface but with no consistent mean bias sign in turbulent fluxes over the Central United States and Southern Great Plains. Nevertheless, biases in the net shortwave and downward longwave fluxes as well as surface evaporative fraction (EF) are contributors to T-2m bias. Radiation biases are largely affected by cloud simulations, while EF bias is largely affected by soil moisture modulated by seasonal accumulated precipitation and evaporation. An approximate equation based upon the surface energy budget is derived to further quantify the magnitudes of radiation and EF contributions to T-2m bias. Our analysis ascribes that a large EF underestimate is the dominant source of error in all models with a large positive temperature bias, whereas an EF overestimate compensates for an excess of absorbed shortwave radiation in nearly all the models with the smallest temperature bias.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2169897X and 21698996
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....b98fb6538a3450bf6bb75fb121c605b6