Back to Search Start Over

An open, randomized single-centre study to compare the efficacy and convenience of follitropin beta administered by a pen device with follitropin alpha administered by a conventional syringe in women undergoing ovarian stimulation for IVF/ICSI

Authors :
Herman Tournaye
Kaan Osmanagaoglu
Andre Van Steirteghem
Els Laurent
Michel Camus
Carola Albano
Peter Platteau
Paul Devroey
Valérie Vernaeve
Source :
Human Reproduction. 18:1200-1204
Publication Year :
2003
Publisher :
Oxford University Press (OUP), 2003.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A pen device, similar to an insulin pen, has been recently marketed for the administration of follitropin b in cartridges. A randomized controlled trial was performed to compare the efficacy and convenience of this pen device delivering follitropin b with a conventional syringe delivering follitropin a. METHODS: A total of 200 patients needing IVF/ICSI treatment and willing to self-inject were enrolled in the study. All subjects had ovarian stimulation according to a long protocol and were randomized to the pen or the conventional syringe group during down-regulation by means of a computer-generated randomization list using random numbers. Patients were asked to fill in a daily local tolerance book after each injection. On the day of hCG the patients scored a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain and convenience. RESULTS: The average duration, total dose of recombinant FSH and number of cumulus oocyte complexes retrieved were 10.8/12.0 days (P = 0.001), 1880/2226 IU (P < 0.001) and 15.2/13.1 respectively in the pen device and conventional syringe groups; the presence of pain after the daily injection was significantly higher in the conventional syringe group (P = 0.027); the visual analogue scale score was similar for pain but significantly more convenient for the pen device (P < 0.001). The live birth rate per embryo transfer was 32.9 and 34.4% respectively in the pen device and conventional syringe groups. CONCLUSIONS: Self-injection with the pen device is safe and easy, more convenient and less painful for the patient, requires less FSH and shortens the treatment duration.

Details

ISSN :
14602350
Volume :
18
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Human Reproduction
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....b98984dc135c1fb0827947a6bdcf2d42
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deg234